- Jan 14, 2016
- 2,773
- 7,087
- AFL Club
- West Coast
I still struggle to believe they've got waiting lists for reserve seat members.
Respect!
It's ridiculous. It's not even a case of simply first in best dressed - you PAY to wait on the waiting list!?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
I still struggle to believe they've got waiting lists for reserve seat members.
Respect!
Honestly amazes me, presumably the new stadium sorts it. We've got a long way to go, clearly.It's ridiculous. It's not even a case of simply first in best dressed - you PAY to wait on the waiting list!?
Fair call, it seems pretty crazy that so many have voted for North in this thread given they are the second youngest list. They may well be in trouble, but that trouble is not age related.Noting we were 'old' last year, and young this year. How does NMFC poll so many votes for 2017? Second youngest team, with a lot of unproven talent is in trouble. BF never change.
Hopefully the trolls drop off as they go back to school.
It will be interesting to see how the new stadium affects this. I know a lot of members who would forego their membership but because of the long waiting list they hold on. I know quite a few who will drop off when they play at the new stadium.Also of note is that every one of West Coast's memberships are 11 game memberships whereas some clubs have 3 game memberships.
There is a large waiting list for members so I'm really hoping they release 3 game memberships with the new stadium (as I want one) but I'm not overly hopeful.
Apparently it's Collingwood because we signed two guys during the off season who weren't on the right side of their 20s.
It's ridiculous. It's not even a case of simply first in best dressed - you PAY to wait on the waiting list!?
It's ridiculous. It's not even a case of simply first in best dressed - you PAY to wait on the waiting list!?
I don't agree with paying to be on a waiting list.
How much does it cost to be on the waiting list ?.
When the new stadium is opened and thus more Eagles memberships are available, will the people who have paid to be on the waiting list, be able to credit these payments against their membership ?.
They'll fill the 60k stadium straight off the bat IMO. The stadium has the ability to be expanded to 80k, and personally I don't know why they didn't just do that in the first place.
Because both Eagles and Freo pushed for it to be 60k.They'll fill the 60k stadium straight off the bat IMO. The stadium has the ability to be expanded to 80k, and personally I don't know why they didn't just do that in the first place.
Because both Eagles and Freo pushed for it to be 60k.
That way there will still be a waiting list for memberships and they can keep the prices high.
Apparantly 6k of seats will be for general admission, Eagles will easily have 54k members signup and still have a waiting list to keep up the prices. Freo will go close if there is a bump in people wanting to be members at the new flash stadium.
If the stadium was 80k even the Eagles would have struggled to fill it and membership prices would have plummeted.
Not a bad place but beware JLT form.I bump this to ask the question, now that the football world has seen most of the youngsters on North's list this pre season, do those that voted for North (the second youngest list in the league) in this thread stand by their vote?
Obviously it is only early, and i expect North to be bottom six this year. But starting a "rebuild" with the second youngest list in the league is a good place to start a rebuild from i would have thought. Some of the kids look like they can actually play as well.
Not a bad place but beware JLT form.
One swallow does not a summer make.I bump this to ask the question, now that the football world has seen most of the youngsters on North's list this pre season, do those that voted for North (the second youngest list in the league) in this thread stand by their vote?
Obviously it is only early, and i expect North to be bottom six this year. But starting a "rebuild" with the second youngest list in the league is a good place to start a rebuild from i would have thought. Some of the kids look like they can actually play as well.
I bump this to ask the question, now that the football world has seen most of the youngsters on North's list this pre season, do those that voted for North (the second youngest list in the league) in this thread stand by their vote?
Obviously it is only early, and i expect North to be bottom six this year. But starting a "rebuild" with the second youngest list in the league is a good place to start a rebuild from i would have thought. Some of the kids look like they can actually play as well.
I'm still worried it's not a premiership quality list when fully developed. Need a few years of pain to get some of the best kids in the country into the team IMO.
I bump this to ask the question, now that the football world has seen most of the youngsters on North's list this pre season, do those that voted for North (the second youngest list in the league) in this thread stand by their vote?
Obviously it is only early, and i expect North to be bottom six this year. But starting a "rebuild" with the second youngest list in the league is a good place to start a rebuild from i would have thought. Some of the kids look like they can actually play as well.
I think we might still be a midfielder or two short, but I do like that we decided to be bold and refresh the list.
As a result I don't think we will bottom right out like other great sides have once their stars retire.
Looking forward to seeing more of Stewart, Lovell, Miles, Howe and others during the year, to see how they develop.
Yeah, there's a few who need to show what they've got.I think the 1-18 players in Hawthorn's team is as good as ever, but I think the 19-22 players are quite a bit weaker.
Apparently it's Collingwood because we signed two guys during the off season who weren't on the right side of their 20s.
How do you know it is not a premiership quality list' going by your metric there is no way you could have said 3 years ago that the Bulldogs would be the 2016 premiers.I'm still worried it's not a premiership quality list when fully developed. Need a few years of pain to get some of the best kids in the country into the team IMO.