partygirl35
Rookie
- Banned
- #1
I think North should draft Polak for his size, Barham as he can play in the forward line and North should look at drafting midfielders. Who do other people think North should at drafting?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by hotham
I would also like to pick up Shane Harvey.
Originally posted by Rooboy 96
am I wrong or wasn't Shane available last draft??? if so does anyone know why he was over-looked???
Originally posted by hotham
Rooboy 96,
I stand to be corrected but Shane was to young for last years draft.
hotham
Originally posted by Rooboy 96
as I see it with picks 7 and 14 I would take the 2 best big men available.... and then midfielders and running players from 30 onwards... ulness we have a smokie hidden away somewhere...
If we could get two of Hale Brookes Braham it would be sensation... and I think most other clubs are after running players... but then Bartel looks good too... I am glad it aint my job on the line...
Originally posted by Rooboy 96
Hotham... you are probably right... I just remeber his name being mentioned last year...
Originally posted by King Corey
From an article about the Harvey brothers before last year's draft-
"“He’s (Shane) a busy little player, nice and quick, and all of his results at the draft camp were really quite good,” says Sheehan. “He might not be up there with the top guys, but he has the same chance as a lot of the other kids in the pool. He’ll just have to wait it out.”
That Shane knows, and probably Brent too; should Harvey No.2 not hear his name called out on the last Sunday of October, he’ll just have another year with the (hopefully) more successful Knights and then, as an 18-year-old, one more tilt."
So - eligible he was.
Originally posted by King Corey
Interesting that Michael Stevens was available as a 17 yo in 1997 as was Nick Stevens. The papers rumoured that we were interested in them but we bypassed both for Shannon Watt - and Michael has to wait another year to be drafted.
Originally posted by King Corey
Michael Stevens has had 3 years on Port's list for little return... dunno that we would target him as a priority - maybe he's not quite AFL standard? Saying that, would rather we punted on him than a 30 year old tho!