- Jun 2, 2010
- 5,408
- 5,881
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
TLDR sorry, but the concept of being stuck mid table is about what some people are referring to. Anyway good luck. Would be nice to see the Saints do well.I can't believe people are buying into this as it's not even remotely close.
I said it previously but North's list in 2016 was the oldest and most experienced in the league. They had 13 players over the age of 28, and 7 of them were over 30. Not only that but they were all good or very good players who were relied on and played a lot of football that season:
The only guy over 30 who didn't play much football was Farren Ray with 4 games. North in 2016 was in prime position to fall of a cliff by the end of the year.
- Harvey 23 games 36 goals
- Petrie 23 games27 goals
- Waite 14 games
- Firrito 22 games
- Dal Santo 22 games
- Wells 19 games etc
St Kilda on the other has 8 players over 28 and they are below. The only important player here is Ryder.
Other than those guys there are 6 players who are 27, only two of them are certain best 22 (Crouch and Hill) the rest are 26 or younger.
- Paul Hunter - Played 7 games back up ruckman not best 22
- Jake Carlise - Played 3 games and delisted
- Dylan Roberton - Retired heart problems didn't play
- Dan Hannebry - Played 2 games
- Shaun McKernan - Played 4 games not best 22 delisted
- James Frawley - Played 3 games not best 22 delisted
- Jarryn Geary - Played 3 games not best 22
- Paddy Ryder - Played 12 games is best 22
Guy's like Sharman, Highmore, Higgins, Clark, Gresham, Coffield, Marshall, King, Patton, Brynes, Bytel, Battle, etc are in the right age bracket to improve and some may even go on and become A grade. There are very few if any best 22 players who will regress with age (Ryder aside)
In short St Kilda is not about to fall off a cliff anytime soon based on the demographics of their list. It may not be a brilliant list but 90% of players are still either of an age where they will keep improving or at the least won't get any worse for around 3-4 years.