- Sep 25, 2013
- 14,901
- 28,983
- AFL Club
- Carlton
I feel sick saying this but I agree with this
Don’t think the Bombers should be near this discussion. Mid table with a finals finish if all goes well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I feel sick saying this but I agree with this
At which clubs?? Our ruck stocks are currently bottom 2 in the league.
The clubs around us number 1 rucks currently are:
Adelaide: Jacobs
GWS: Flynn and Preuss
North Melbourne: Goldstein and Xerri
Essendon: Draper
Eagles: Nic Nat
None of Reeves. Meek. Lynch or Ramsden are starting at any of the above. It’s all potential at the moment. That’s it.
I think Reeves has massive potential but he’s another 2 years off being a consistently good afl ruckman. He’s not nearly fit enough. His tap work is decent but can’t find the ball around the ground and doesn’t take nearly enough marks for his size. His first quarter against Geelong last season is what he needs to produce for 4 quarters every game.
Meek has been playing WAFL and like Reeves has potential to be a good ruckman but we won’t know until the end of 2023 at the earliest how good he can be.
Then there’s Max Lynch who is a number 2 AFL ruck at his best.
Ramsden will play the majority of the season at box hill and only play at senior level should we get injuries. He also looks like more of a forward/ruck than a ruck/forward.
How would you describe Hawthorn's depth compared to most?
Just looked through the list to identify the 3 - 4 players the Hawks would not want to lose injured.
Sisily
Lewis
Newcomb
Jaith
After that Im struggling to identify a key player ahead of any other. Amon? Wingard, Bruest?
Where did I say that we have great depth?
I didn’t.
As I posted already, you’re looking for an argument that isnt there
Knowing Sam Mitchell will prioritise getting games into some young guys, we actually have surprisingly decent depth which has been highlighted on our board with 'potential best 22's for round 1' being created.
Players such as Connor Nash, Finn Maginness, Harry Morrison, Jarman Impey, Sam Butler and Sam Frost are missing final selection in some projected sides and all were best 22 when fit for the majority of 2022.
Is our depth currently at an enviable point compared to other sides? No. But it's stronger than many outside the club would realise.
it is a forum where debate is welcome, feel free to debate and not end up in a pissing contest
Only 12 months ago Collingwood were one of the favourites for the spoon ………
I wouldn't be surprised if they're bottom 4. I think they rolled out an interesting adjustment to zoning football in McRae's first year. However, they still have a very crappy group of young players, other than one superstar and all teams will be either playing a similar run-and-gun game or have defensive plans that will stop it.
Winning a lot of close games coming from 4 or 5 goals down gave them a lot of confidence to never give up when it wouldn't have been pessimistic to do so. However, I have given up on the majority of humans understanding the nature of probability will let people find out this year that luck very often comes in streaks. If they struggle to come up with the 5 or 6 lucky wins that kept them in finals contention the season starts to look very different. Older players look older, they are moved out of key roles to let kids develop and they are typically inconsistent. Pressure mounts to try different things and then the final part of the tailspin is a "readjustment of expectations".
Yes, Geelong's list can fall off a cliff at any point, but I still see 6 or 7 teams with prime demographics that "should" finish higher than Collingwood next year. If Collingwood then drops the close ones to mid-range or lower teams, it will be an ugly year and the pressure will be high because of unrealistic expectations.
While i think the pies have a good list and will play finalsThey did have a few lucky wins last season but their list is strong and underrated by many here. They have elite players across every line and good depth. They have a brilliant coach as well.
29+:
Pendlebury, Sidebottom, Howe, Elliott, Adams (when not injured) Mihocek, Mitchell and crisp are all quality.
Tom Mitchell will be massive for them. Exact player they need. He will feed the ball out to the Daicos’s, crisp, Pendles and Sidebottom.
24-28:
McStay, Moore, Maynard, Degoey, Cameron, Noble and even Johnson who was arguably the best mid-season pick up last season are all best 22 players. Moore, Maynard and Degoey are A graders.
24 and under:
Daicos’s elite with lipinski, Ginnivan and Quaynor quality.
The likes of Macrae, Bianco, McCreery, Ruscoe, Carmichael and McInnes all have played senior football and look like they will make it.
The Magpies should absolutely be playing finals in 2023 and be looking at finishing top 4 again.
While i think the pies have a good list and will play finals
A harder draw and if a few of those close ones go the other way, they probably finish 5-8th
I think their scoring power gets found out in that top tierAgreed..don’t think they are same tier as cats, tigers and lions. I have them with the blues, demons and swans. They should definitely make the 8.
Their home and away season last year was similar to ours in 2018. They just happened to make a prelim.
Shhh.Weird GWS is on this poll. They are very young and still got way too much talent to finish last imo.
Only 12 months ago Collingwood were one of the favourites for the spoon ………
Yeah… looks like you’re window is closing.The difference here is the Pies retained a decent group of quality senior players and role players to lead the way.
Pendlebury, Adams, Sidebottom, Moore, De Goey, Howe, Cox, Roughead, Maynard, Crisp, Mioheck, Elliot.
12 senior players leading the way and supporting the developing players and new kids.
Hawks have taken a more aggressive approach.
Considering the Pies seem to often be good enough to make a GF but not win one only time will tell who has the better approach.
CuteLooking at the Hawks list to me looks like they are destined to be low to mid for a number of years. Other clubs with way more young and mid-aged talent.
St Kilda areas.
Disagree. Projecting for mid-range at best.Cute
Spoken like you havent looked at the list at all and to compare to St Kilda is laughable
Excessive high draft picks arn't everything, as evidenced by GWS
Have hit on lower picks with Lewis, CJ, Newcombe etc
Rebuild well on track
Yeah… looks like you’re window is closing.
Disagree, laughable opinionDisagree. Projecting for mid-range at best.
If the Hawks are close, what are the Eagles?
Good money if you want to get on the Hawks, but then again we were hotter favorites last year and look at how that turned out.
View attachment 1581154
Tassie is an out and out home venue for Hawthorn against all teams while the MCG is only one against 10 sidesMore than happy to wager the Eagles will finish higher than the Hawks.
Significantly more quality senior players still on the list and some nice kids coming through.
How many games are Hawthorn giving up home ground advantage for playing in Tassie?
Disagree. More laughable opinion… hilarious in fact. “A final opinion”… we are all having an opinion on everyone’s lists… which change every year… silly comment.Disagree, laughable opinion
With a list still developing, a final opinion on said list is impossible
You have made a final call on an unfinished listDisagree. More laughable opinion… hilarious in fact. “A final opinion”… we are all having an opinion on everyone’s lists… which change every year… silly comment.