Who has the potential to be a dynasty this decade?

[BigVic]

Hawks have the potential to be another dynasty winning multiple flags this decade with this young core have sustained success.

 

[Colonial]

Hawks have a great bunch of young coming through, my Giants have strong youth if we can hang on to them.
Don’t rule out North.

 

[BigVic]

North could be Hawks 2.0 next year and rise up the ladder. Back to the 70s with a North Melbourne vs Hawthorn future grand final and the rivalry reigniting after 50 years

 

[Dirty Bird]

Insert my team

 

[Colonial]

Insert my team

So far no one has really done that.

 

[PetterdHoisted]

feel like it will continue to go Hawks, Tigers, Hawks, Tigers

post-WW2 they have been pretty dominant in streaks, as a pair of clubs

other clubs tend to win more irregularly

 

[Colonial]

feel like it will continue to go Hawks, Tigers, Hawks, Tigers

post-WW2 they have been pretty dominant in streaks, as a pair of clubs

other clubs tend to win more irregularly

Lions won 3 in a row

 

[Strapping Young Lad]

North could be Hawks 2.0 next year and rise up the ladder. Back to the 70s with a North Melbourne vs Hawthorn future grand final and the rivalry reigniting after 50 years

Who is North’s Sicily, Amon, Breust, Gunston, Impey, Frost and Hardwick?

They have a huge gap in talent over 24 years of age to be doing any big rise up the ladder next year, but I’m sure we’ll hear all summer about it regardless.

 

[BigVic]

From 1967-1989 Hawks and Tigers were the dominant teams as well as Blues and North.

 

[Colonial]

Who is North’s Sicily, Amon, Breust, Gunston, Impey, Frost and Hardwick?

They have a huge gap in talent over 24 years of age to be doing any big rise up the ladder next year, but I’m sure we’ll hear all summer about it regardless.

defensive one arent we.

 

[PetterdHoisted]

From 1967-1989 Hawks and Tigers were the dominant teams as well as Blues and North.

yep, and the 2010s went the same way, can't think of teams other than the Hawks and Tigers that have had two dynasties since WW2?

radio silence in between, whereas most other clubs tend to spread the wins out a bit more!

 

[Strapping Young Lad]

defensive one arent we.

It’s not defensive, its fact.

Go read the Hawks, Crows, North thread. All the Roos posters are saying the exact same thing.
They have lots of talented kids and a bunch of no-name over 25’s that let them down each week.

 

[Colonial]

yep, and the 2010s went the same way, can't think of teams other than the Hawks and Tigers that have had two dynasties since WW2?

radio silence in between, whereas most other clubs tend to spread the wins out a bit more!

to be fair almost half the comp only started joining over the last 30 years, 50 years after WW2. The AFL started in the 90's before then it was a state comp.

 

[Colonial]

It’s not defensive, its fact.

Go read the Hawks, Crows, North thread. All the Roos posters are saying the exact same thing.
They have lots of talented kids and a bunch of no-name over 25’s that let them down each week.

No its opinion, yours.

 

[Strapping Young Lad]

No its opinion, yours.

No, it’s fact.

Name their older players leading them in effort each week?

 

[PetterdHoisted]

to be fair almost half the comp only started joining over the last 30 years, 50 years after WW2. The AFL started in the 90's before then it was a state comp.

Well there has been 80 years of continuity for 12 clubs in the league, right? With perhaps only two recording multiple compressed eras of success, so it's bloody unlikely.

I've not answer the thread question I guess, as I'm not saying WHEN the Hawks and Tigers will dynasty again (tbh might have to wait 2-3 decades again), just saying that they have form!

 

[Colonial]

No, it’s fact.

Name their older players leading them in effort each week?

No its opinion. Stop being brittle

 

[Colonial]

Well there has been 80 years of continuity for 12 clubs in the league, right? With perhaps only two recording multiple compressed eras of success, so it's bloody unlikely.

Of 18, and the AFL kicked off in 1990.

I've not answer the thread question I guess, as I'm not saying WHEN the Hawks and Tigers will dynasty again (tbh might have to wait 2-3 decades again), just saying that they have form!

Form when almost half the league wasn’t part of it.

 

[stallon]

My team obviously

 

[Delisted]

Of 18, and the AFL kicked off in 1990.

Form when almost half the league wasn’t part of it.

Defensive aren't we.

 

[BigVic]

We only won flags since WWII in 1953, 1958, 1990, 2010 and 2023 including a drawn final/drawn grand final. Last dynasty for us was the "machine team" from 1927-30 and our last back-to-back team was in 1935-36

 

[Colonial]

Defensive aren't we.

lol, no you see what I wrote was facts not opinions.
You seem to struggle with that.
Buy a dictionary.

 

[Colonial]

We only won flags since WWII in 1953, 1958, 1990, 2010 and 2023 including a drawn final/drawn grand final. Last dynasty for us was the "machine team" from 1927-30 and our last back-to-back team was in 1935-36

So two AFL flags.

 

[Freomaniac]

Insert my team

The crows didnt tank Hard enough mate. lol

 

[BigVic]

So two AFL flags.

1990 was the first year of the AFL era