Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Was waiting for it. Better late than never
KB got done dirty on that one. Could have named both him and Matthews if they really wantedPretty hard to separate Dusty, Royce Hart, KB and Francis Bourke imo.
Hart was the greatest CHF of all time (along with Carey), named at CHF in the team of the century.
Bourke was on the wing in the all time team of the century but could play anywhere. Hard as *.
KB was the biggest omission from that team, great small forward/rover but probably competed with Leigh Matthew for that spot.
I'll include Dyer as well in the five i'd name.
Bartlett and Martin are standouts. Anyone who voted Rance has no idea.Maurice Rioli was maybe the most talented player.
He burst on scene and was always a good player but maybe got weighed down by the decline of the club during his time there.
Ian Stewart would be in the conversation if he played more games at Richmond and not wasted his time at the Saints. Not old enough to see him play but his reputation is huge amongst those who did.
Im 58I'll only pick the players I've seen and watched in my lifetime, because otherwise I'm just basing it on hearsay and not my own opinions.
Martin, Richardson, Rance, Riewoldt are the best Tigers I have seen.
Agree that Ian Stewart would be right up there if he had just been a tiger. Living in Moorabbin saw a lot of his games with the saints, and for mine he is the toughest player I have seen. Not tough as in biffo tough, but mentally tough and being able to absorb the hard hits in the days when hits were part and parcel of the game. Just a brilliant player.Maurice Rioli was maybe the most talented player.
He burst on scene and was always a good player but maybe got weighed down by the decline of the club during his time there.
Ian Stewart would be in the conversation if he played more games at Richmond and not wasted his time at the Saints. Not old enough to see him play but his reputation is huge amongst those who did.
KB I agree is the best. An absolute star. They changed the rules to try and stop him. Dusty 2nd. Not much in it. Then Hart.I’ve not long turned 64 so I’ve seen the great sides of the 60’s/70’s and for me whenever this question comes up, straight away I think of KB. Absolute champion, rarely beaten, never lost his pace.
Richo was great and you knew he just bled yellow and black and wore his heart on his sleeve.
Dusty is fabulous and in the 2017 QF it seemed he had the ball on a string.
Overall I think KB
P.S Honourable mention to Francis Bourke
Castagna?The little champ for me.
Maurice Rioli was maybe the most talented player.
He burst on scene and was always a good player but maybe got weighed down by the decline of the club during his time there.
Ian Stewart would be in the conversation if he played more games at Richmond and not wasted his time at the Saints. Not old enough to see him play but his reputation is huge amongst those who did.
spring chickenIm 58
spring chook
I wonder what sort of player Richo would have been playing with our current team? He would literally hold up the team on the back of his shoulders and miraculously win the game for us or spectacularly fail wearing his heart on his sleeve the whole battle. We relied more on him than we ever have in Dusty, Hart, KB or Disco. It's such a crime we were such a sh.te team and club when he was at his peak.
And Hart was never as good after he did his knee half 6 years into his career. Much greater legacy if he had played uninjured until he was in his early 30's like most other champions.There are a few in category, Matty Knights in today's side would be interesting too. Probably the two I would have liked to have seen their best with our best. Dale Weightman is another.
Hart had no peers for me. His role and Dusty's are entirely different, and yet, the coaches of each era would have said the same thing when the chips were down - just get the ball to Royce (Hafey) or Dusty (Dimma). Can you compare? A little, but the eras where just so different, the medical, the training, the footy style, ebb and flow. Ironically both were/are the same height, which underlines Hart's greatness in the role he played - predominately at CHF. Hart had a stride you would kill for, whereas Dusty is compact, made for collisions and a heart-breaking killer.
View attachment 1572568
Stupid poll considering Dusty is the greatest of all time and he is a Richmond player . Hart ,KB,Rance next in line and I noticed some had Bourke lol he wouldnt. even make my top 10 .
Richo would be in my top 10 but lets face it his kicking and skills let him down .No Richo?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com