- Aug 2, 2012
- 34,820
- 56,389
- AFL Club
- Geelong
ABC journosCan you believe support for the monarchy has risen over the past 2 weeks ?
Who do they ask ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
ABC journosCan you believe support for the monarchy has risen over the past 2 weeks ?
Who do they ask ?
The ABC has dispatched a staggering 27 people to the UK to cover the death of Queen Elizabeth II, including three local radio presenters.
The stories they and their commercial colleagues are sharing with us back in Australia are truly wonderful...
Australian monarchists are required to stay at home today, curtains drawn, dressed in black, all electronic devices off in solemn mourning for the passing of their Queen.
The rest of us can treat today like any other public holiday.
David Littleproud is now giving his condolence motion.
He’s speaking about the chair the Queen sat on while visiting a homestead in Longreach (western Queensland) and how after she left, it became known as ‘The Throne’ and it is still pointed out to visitors.
Debating the important things in Parliament today. Ffs.
Thank God the Festival of Death is over.Debating the important things in Parliament today. Ffs.
Thank God the Festival of Death is over.
But given new incumbent's age most of us will have to go through the same ritualistic BS within a couple of decades.
I do hope Charlie and his adulterous 'consort' are frequent visitors to Australia in coming years.You've got the coronation to look forward to in May-June 2023 and then the investiture of the Prince of Wales. And there's a visit to Australia too. That'll be Charles' 17th visit to Australia (His late mother visited 16 times), including two terms at Timbertop, Geelong (from January-August 1966)
I do hope Charlie and his adulterous 'consort' are frequent visitors to Australia in coming years.
Could think of nothing that would push Australia towards becoming a republic faster.
He'll be himself.
So he'll do a good job then.
Is that the best you can come up with? 'Adulterous consort'. Does that actually mean anything to anyone?
If Lizzy thought he was even half competent she would have abdicated 20 years ago.
Charles' current partner, Camilla Parker Bowles, is the Royal Consort.
And the person who in a TV interview with Jonathon Dimbleby in 1994 Charles admitted to having an adulterous relationship with while still married to his former wife the late Dianna, Princess of Wales.
Charles' current partner, Camilla Parker Bowles, is the Royal Consort.
And the person who in a TV interview with Jonathon Dimbleby in 1994 Charles admitted to having an adulterous relationship with while still married to his former wife the late Dianna, Princess of Wales.
He couldn't even remember the date.
Couldn't use a fountain pen properly.
If Lizzy thought he was even half competent she would have abdicated 20 years ago.
Unless there's something she has written in a journal saying that, you're really just making something up to qualify your assertion.
I think step one for a republic is a plebiscite with a simple question on whether we should have a process to choose a republic model - not straight to the end. Commit the nation to the process if there is enough of a vote in support moving to a republic of any description.
Spend some time working models, vote again and if one of them gets 50%+1 of the vote it goes straight to referendum at the following federal election.
7 year process. 2025 election plebiscite. 2028 election model chosen. 2031 election either run off of model choice or referendum to make it official.
Anything less than a referendum is not binding because a change of the Constitution requires a referendum.
So, step 1 has to be referendum.
Big deal. The fountain pen leaked. So? And the date? Its a very common occurence that people ask what day of the week it is or what date it is.
No she wouldn't. That is totally made up.
It's binding because the overwhelming public support will become a political issue. The constitution change requiring a referendum is not relevant.
The only risk of a plebiscite is that it might show people aren't that interested in it. If it comes back with 60%+ then the major parties will know it's a winning policy.
The process isn't going to rush to the finish of the referendum without a comfortable model in place - that's why the last one failed. With the plebiscite the power of democracy will make it happen.