- Joined
- Mar 25, 2019
- Posts
- 26,153
- Reaction score
- 53,301
- AFL Club
- Carlton
How'd they go on Good Friday this year? Or the one before that? Or the one before that?North absolutely smacked around Carlton for 3 quarters.
Says all u need to know.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

How'd they go on Good Friday this year? Or the one before that? Or the one before that?North absolutely smacked around Carlton for 3 quarters.
Says all u need to know.
Not that wellHow'd they go on Good Friday this year? Or the one before that? Or the one before that?
Alright walshisthegoatHow'd they go on Good Friday this year? Or the one before that? Or the one before that?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Blues are rebuilding according to who?At least North have a number of quality youngsters to take them into the short and long term future. Bad time to be starting another rebuild for Carlton with Tassie coming in. Wouldn’t surprise if Voss is sacked by the bye …… they won’t make finals for another decade as their list is below average!
Maybe you can explain what you personally call it when your club realises it has peaked at a 13 win home and away season, and takes its list backwards for two consecutive seasons, including losing 2 of your top 6 players at the prime age for AFL players?Blues are rebuilding according to who?
How'd they go on Good Friday this year? Or the one before that? Or the one before that?
Tell us mr know it all, what was the better option, going to the draft for the past few years and next year until Tassie come in or should we of done what your team done, offer 1st rd draft picks for old b-c grade player's until we inevitably are forced to go full rebuild?Maybe you can explain what you personally call it when your club realises it has peaked at a 13 win home and away season, and takes its list backwards for two consecutive seasons, including losing 2 of your top 6 players at the prime age for AFL players?
How many 'rebuilding clubs' bring in more players via trade than they do the draft?Maybe you can explain what you personally call it when your club realises it has peaked at a 13 win home and away season, and takes its list backwards for two consecutive seasons, including losing 2 of your top 6 players at the prime age for AFL players?
A "renovation"?Maybe you can explain what you personally call it when your club realises it has peaked at a 13 win home and away season, and takes its list backwards for two consecutive seasons, including losing 2 of your top 6 players at the prime age for AFL players?
severe lack of Hardeman in any discussion about our backline. Can defend, rebound, and kick like a mule with accuracy.McDonald is very accountable, he just can’t be trusted doing anything ambitious ball in hand.
Would be disappointed if Fisher and Corr are anything more than emergencies for the senior team at this point.
FOS is a very balanced and accountable defender, albeit young, and probably destined for the midfield within a couple seasons.
Agree there’s a challenge in the backline chemistry atm, insofar as none of our three first-choice key defenders (Logue, Comben, and Pink) are great distributors, so we need at least two defenders with great offensive weapons. FOS, Kerch and Daniel are all great users. Archer is a good small lockdown type. Hoping that some configuration of those 7 plus Goater and McDonald can do the job until Dawson and Thredgold are ready.
The best option was making the most of the handful of elite players Carlton had on their list and building a list around them that was capable of contending for premierships over a 5 year period, as everyone expected when they saw the likes of Cripps, Weitering, Curnow, Walsh and McKay emerging.Tell us mr know it all, what was the better option, going to the draft for the past few years and next year until Tassie come in or should we of done what your team done, offer 1st rd draft picks for old b-c grade player's until we inevitably are forced to go full rebuild?
Yep.How many 'rebuilding clubs' bring in more players via trade than they do the draft?
Pick 3
Pick 45
Pick 47
Hardly a sign that a team is heavily investing in a rebuild lmao.
'Competing for finals' is 'an era of dominance'?I think we will be entering a new era in about 2 years time, I'm expecting to see some teams who have been up there for a while (Brisbane, Geelong, Collingwood etc) to come crashing down the ladder once their run is done, and clubs like north beginning their era of dominance, competing for finals.
3 premierships in 68 years and you think Collingwood have dominated footy during this time span , so yeah, its all relative'Competing for finals' is 'an era of dominance'?
I guess it's all relative...
Don't deflect, stick to the thread topic.3 premierships in 68 years and you think Collingwood have dominated footy during this tine span , so yeah, its all relative
No top 4 finishes in 25 years while skipping a prelim final just 2 seasons ago is interesting as well, you use the same troll in all the Carlton threads mate.Don't deflect, stick to the thread topic.
On the thread topic - 0 top 4 finishes in 25 years has Carlton as THE SINGLE WORST PERFORMED TEAM in that time, with Carlton long odds to break that streak in 2026, and far more likely to finish bottom 4 than top 4.
Which means the discussion around whether North or Carlton will finish higher in 2026 is both interesting and valid.
No top 4 finishes in 25 years while skipping a prelim final just 2 seasons ago is interesting as well, you use the same troll in all the Carlton threads mate.
We beat Melbourne along the way to the prelim, if you're trying to make any point here except troll Carlton you haven't.View attachment 2493934
This year, where Carlton were 2.5 games behind 4th placed Melbourne? (And Collingwood finished 1st, and won the premiership)
Yep, I never said that Carlton weren't Preliminary Finalists.We beat Melbourne along the way to the prelim, if you're trying to make any point here except troll Carlton you haven't.
That's what i said mate, nice of you to acknowledge that we played in a prelim which you left out, i don't care where we finished in the home and away season.Yep, I never said that Carlton weren't Preliminary Finalists.
The facts are:
1. Melbourne finished 4th, but were eliminated from the finals in straight sets.
2. Carlton finished 5th, and qualified for a Preliminary Final.
Why would I need to mention a Preliminary Final appearance when referencing the fact it's been 25 years since Carlton have had a top 4 finish?That's what i said mate, nice of you to acknowledge that we played in a prelim which you left out, i don't care where we finished in the home and away season.
It's like telling half a story and telling it your way mate.Why would I need to mention a Preliminary Final appearance when referencing the fact it's been 25 years since Carlton have had a top 4 finish?
It would be like me saying Collingwood have had 11 top 4 finishes over the same timeframe, but feeling the need to add that we also made a Preliminary Final in 2007, despite finishing outside the top 4....