Whose going to be the bigger player?

[bionicsasquach]

Just interested to know your opinions of which of these players is going to be the best: David King, Luke Mullins, Luke Shackleton, Julian Rowe, and also Brayden & Heath Shaw. By not knowing much about any King seems to have the most potentiol

 

[brentoncowell]

King looks goodish but Brayden has just raw talent and smooth as silk in all aspects of the game. He is well rounded and a leader type player. If he lives up to my expectations he will be an AFL superstar.

 

[Neville Bartos]

One thing is for sure, Julian Rowe, is gonna make footy look really difficult coz he eats poo. He is a flashy idiot, with no discipline and no control.

 

[labrooy]

Originally posted by nevillebartos
One thing is for sure, Julian Rowe, is gonna make footy look really difficult coz he eats poo. He is a flashy idiot, with no discipline and no control.

I have noticed that Hawks supporters seem to have a problem making intelligent statements. If their board is like that then no wonder they troll on here.

Its hard to say which will be the best of the bunch but quite a few "experts" are tipping Brayden Shaw to be something special. Personally I can't wait to see Billy Morrison in action.

 

[MarkT]

I hope Brayden and Heath are good because that will make 2 from that list.

 

[leonmagic]

agree about jules rowe - he is a joke on legs


best from that pack will be Brayden, id say shack has as much potential as him but i dont think he'll fill it with our style of play.

kingy certainly doesnt have a lot of natural talent, but he will produce the goods

 

[Nic]

Antoher vote for Brayden, he's supposed to be the best out of them - we'll see if it's true.

 

[Lockyer24]

You would expect Brayden, but Heath is looking quite good atm

 

[Lonie_from_50]

After the hype of Grand Final Week 2003, David King has the most potential, but with a name like Shaw, they will be either really good, or really ****.

Julian Rowe - Seems to be a good low round pick-up. but there is more potential needed.