Number37
Anyhow, have a Winfield 25.
- Oct 5, 2013
- 22,223
- 24,271
- AFL Club
- Sydney
I wasn't having a go, I was Lol'ing. Wiki. LOL.
Why boycotting Israel matters
- Thread starter Dont be a lemon
- Start date
- Tagged users None
I wasn't having a go, I was Lol'ing. Wiki. LOL.
Number37
Anyhow, have a Winfield 25.
- Oct 5, 2013
- 22,223
- 24,271
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Countries that haven't signed the Rome Convention, can, and do.
Number37
Anyhow, have a Winfield 25.
- Oct 5, 2013
- 22,223
- 24,271
- AFL Club
- Sydney
I don't write positive things about Israel, therefore it's all lies and I am an embarrassment.
Got it.
Thanks.
- Dec 22, 2009
- 62,724
- 36,768
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Matildas/Socceroos/LFC/MVFC/RCStrasbourg
Theres plenty of bad s**t that Israel does. Genocide is not part of that.
- Dec 22, 2009
- 62,724
- 36,768
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Matildas/Socceroos/LFC/MVFC/RCStrasbourg
So now you are not quoting the Genocide Convrntion for some reason. Wonder what reaskn that might be?
Number37
Anyhow, have a Winfield 25.
- Oct 5, 2013
- 22,223
- 24,271
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Number37
Anyhow, have a Winfield 25.
- Oct 5, 2013
- 22,223
- 24,271
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Dec 22, 2009
- 62,724
- 36,768
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Matildas/Socceroos/LFC/MVFC/RCStrasbourg
You're losing the plot. Israel is far form being the best, the IDF have blood on their hands and are responsible for unnceccesary civilian deaths. Israel is jointly responsible for the Palestinian crisis.
Just because someone cites factual information doesn't mean they think Israel is the best thing in the world. Do try and stay off the koolaid.
Last edited:
Palestinian response to the charges they should be facing would be 'not guilty as the Israelis are too good at defending themselves so we haven't been able to kill them all yet, we just want to"
On SM-G570F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Number37
Anyhow, have a Winfield 25.
- Oct 5, 2013
- 22,223
- 24,271
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Israel, after assassinating the leader that had them on the brink of signing a peace deal, has been governed by the equivalent of One Nation.
Not only has it been governed by One Nation, it has been governed by a series of CORRUPT PM's.
Prior to the equivalent of One Nation taking power, Palestinians were relatively OK.
Since the equivalent of One Nation took power in Israel, Israel has adopted policy after policy of destroying the lives of Palestinians.
80% of Palestinians depend on aid, just to survive.
Israel has adopted policy after policy of severely restricting aid or banning aid altogether.
What is it about electricity, food & water that is so critical to a peace deal that Israel needs to prevent Palestinians from accessing it?
What is it about medical aid that is so critical to the peace process that Israel needs to prevent medical aid from passing to the Palestinians?
Israel is starving the Palestinians, blocking their access to clean water and severely restricting medical aid.
Why?
What gives Israel the right to do any of those things?
- Dec 22, 2009
- 62,724
- 36,768
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Matildas/Socceroos/LFC/MVFC/RCStrasbourg
You are talking crap again. None of the things you post are true for West Bank residents.
Power and water is definitely an issue for Gaza strip residents. If only Hamas spent the considerable funding they receive on such things instead of waging a war on Israel things may be better for Gaza residents.
I dont agree with the economic blockade on Gaza strip. Israel & Egypr enforce it because of Hamas' status as a terrorist organisation. I dont believe citozens should suffer because of it.
As for medical aid Israel provides plenty to Gazan residents. Much more so than Egypt. Gazans have blown up checkpoints for medical aid before in suicide bomber attacks which results in stricter security for Gazans wanting medical care in Israel. Quite why you dont hold Hamas responsible for the poor living conditions in Gaza is difficult to understand logically but not surorising when you consistently claim everything is Israels fault and that organisations like Hamas are fantastic.
Number37
Anyhow, have a Winfield 25.
- Oct 5, 2013
- 22,223
- 24,271
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Egypt.
Hamas.
.
.
.
.
Everybody else.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
At what point do you want to hold Israel responsible?
We've had shills in here telling us that 10 minutes is all it would take.
Imagine one country has that much power that in 10 minutes it could render another country goneski.
Imagine.
Imagine having all that power but being powerless to control yourself and let the people eat, drink water and have medical aid.
Imagine that.
All that power.
So f'ing impressive.
What is the power used for?
Blaming everyone else.
Just like you.
The Israeli way.
Liars, thieves, corrupt.
Genociding the Palestinians because they want to teach Hamas a lesson.
F me, you are sad.
Talking drivel as per usual. The British not only brought civilisation they generally bought peace as well.
Accusing others of being sad whilst pathetically trying to make a claim of genocide.
peace by invading other nations? peace by pushing an entire indigenous race towards extinction? peace by starving a million to death? heck, you starved a million irish right next door to you. You are an out and out fascist mate, its shameful to be you. Just google, bengal famine for example, i am sure you cheered the starvation of 4 million bengalis? you are one vile human being, your avatar is so you...well done.
Ned_Flanders
Make me an Admin!
- Aug 22, 2009
- 77,158
- 142,364
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- 76'ers
Don't forget their pivotal role in establishing the slave trade to the americas
Or resorting to gunboat diplomacy to protect their opium trade in china
- Aug 2, 2012
- 34,820
- 56,390
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Or cutting and running from their moral obligations to the inhabitants of Palestine when Zionist terrorists scared them off.
And who can forget their brilliant settlement of Indian affairs - another example of them cutting and running when things got too hard.
divide and rule was their policy, that's how they got into India in the first place...was indeed a masterstroke. India had more than 20% of the worlds GDP before they came.
The Indian economy under the British Rule describes the economy of India during the years of the British Rule, from 1858 to 1947. During this period, according to British economist Angus Maddison, India's share of the world economy collapsed from 24.4% to 4.2% between 1700 and 1950. India was deindustrialized by the British.[1] Compared to the Mughal Era, India during the British colonial era had a lower per-capita income, a large decline in the secondary sector,[2] and lower levels of urbanisation.[3]
William Digby estimated that from 1870-1900 £900 million was transferred from India.[5]
Economy of India under the British Raj - Wikipedia
Dont forget the "prosperity" and peace though. Raping , robbing stealing and leaving a nation broke! Only 50 million died! medusala is a vile individual who loves invasion and mass murder. No surprise he is a Brexiter.
As usual Bull shiteFor ages there was no conflict in the area. It was a multicultural population - approximately 86 percent Muslim, 10 percent Christian, and 4 percent Jewish – living in peace.
Constant pressure from Zionists led to the partition. However, even that wasn't sufficient for the Zionists who proceeded stealing land and are doing so today.
Several times I've asked the apologists here to go through the telling speech to the UN Security Council by the wonderful Human Rights Lawyer, Emily Schaeffer Omer- Man and refute what this first hand witness said - point by point. Not one response.
There is a history not contaminated by the propagandists published by Jews for Justice for Palestinians Read and learn.
You really don't have a clue on the brexit thread, but your not too bad. Don't join the general Racism that this board allows to be promoted in regard to Israel and jewish people.divide and rule was their policy, that's how they got into India in the first place...was indeed a masterstroke. India had more than 20% of the worlds GDP before they came.
The Indian economy under the British Rule describes the economy of India during the years of the British Rule, from 1858 to 1947. During this period, according to British economist Angus Maddison, India's share of the world economy collapsed from 24.4% to 4.2% between 1700 and 1950. India was deindustrialized by the British.[1] Compared to the Mughal Era, India during the British colonial era had a lower per-capita income, a large decline in the secondary sector,[2] and lower levels of urbanisation.[3]
William Digby estimated that from 1870-1900 £900 million was transferred from India.[5]
Economy of India under the British Raj - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Dont forget the "prosperity" and peace though. Raping , robbing stealing and leaving a nation broke! Only 50 million died! medusala is a vile individual who loves invasion and mass murder. No surprise he is a Brexiter.
LOL...quality reply, as usual, i see you don't reply to my messages and usually play the man, straight out of medusalas playbook. You been owned many times in that thread. You don't even understand how Brexit works, democracy blah blah...
You don't even know my position regarding Israel. Again, resorting to insults to avoid replying to the actual topic in hand. Go back and keep reading daily fail.
What a load of tosh. Who built all the infrastructure that still exists today?
As for Maddison the economy was twice as big when they left, per capita gdp didnt grow as due to the peace and justice the British bought the population more than doubled
Another vacuous TP argument down the toilet.
The Royal Navy at huge cost to Britain was pivotal in ending the slave trade.
lol! my goodness me! you don't even read the links i gave you, let me help.
No one is claiming they didn't give anything back to the economy. But at what cost? 50 million starved/killed/raped to death, 900 million pounds (1900 money) transferred from India to Britain. We are talking about genocide, try to stick to the subject maybe? Do you think the British invaded other countries with the intention of it being "peaceful"? if someone invades your home, do you think they came in peace? People like Gandhi got oxygen cause they had supporters like the British.
The economy was twice as big cause of population. Per capita GDP went down the toilet by about 50%!
From Maddison:
Due to the colonial policies of the British, the result was a significant transfer of capital from India to England leading to a massive drain of revenue, rather than any systematic effort at modernisation of the domestic economy
There is no doubt that our grievances against the British Empire had a sound basis. As the painstaking statistical work of the Cambridge historian Angus Maddison has shown, India's share of world income collapsed from 22.6% in 1700, almost equal to Europe's share of 23.3% at that time, to as low as 3.8% in 1952. Indeed, at the beginning of the 20th century, "the brightest jewel in the British Crown" was the poorest country in the world in terms of per capita income.
| Year | PPP GDP per Capita of India (as % of UK) |
|---|---|
| 1820 | 31.25 |
| 1870 | 16.72 |
| 1913 | 13.68 |
Another nothing argument by the lover of genocide.
Last edited:
Just another insightful, thoughtful contribution from the threads very own doofus. Replace threads with 'boards'.
Last edited:
