Roast Why Derek?

[Carringbush2010]

People outside the inner sanctum can argue all they like. It's irrelevant...

To quote you
"Probably not, but just goes to show the club does care about people."

Also irrelevant, but my post is relevant to your quote

 

[jmac70]

To quote you
"Probably not, but just goes to show the club does care about people."

Also irrelevant, but my post is relevant to your quote

Relevant or irrelevant, who gives a shit?

 

[Carringbush2010]

He was listed at the time of trade. Burden of proof is on those who think he was to be delisted

So no proof then

 

[jmac70]

So no proof then

You got some?

 

[Carringbush2010]

Relevant or irrelevant, who gives a shit?

It seems you do.................... touche'

 

[left at home]

Murray was not going to be delisted. If we did not come knocking would have been kept on the cat b list for another year

 

[jmac70]

It seems you do.................... touche'

Not really, I just like conversing with you.

 

[Carringbush2010]

You got some?

No otherwise I wouldn't have asked

 

[jmac70]

No otherwise I wouldn't have asked

Stalemate?

 

[Carringbush2010]

Murray was not going to be delisted. If we did not come knocking would have been kept on the cat b list for another year

Surely the club must've have seen something in him, IMHO (humble) I think it's a gamble given he's cat b rookie and hasn't played a senior game after 2 years in the system.

I am confident that CFC knows something we don't and that's why they paid overs or so it seems to us.

So Collingwood this better f***** work, otherwise I'll gladly go up for an assault charge and punch the collective signatory's in the face

 

[Carringbush2010]

Stalemate?

We're not playing chess mate, just wanna it confirmed one way or the other if the swans wanted to keep him

 

[wicksy]

I'd be questioning the relationship there good Sir.

You get her a spanking new car

And all she does is feed you? An a pie no less?

That's all?

I think she should be at least spanking you back.... at least

The spanky spank goes without saying good sir.

 

[Carringbush2010]

Not really, I just like conversing with you.

Yeah I like our banter too

 

[jmac70]

We're not playing chess mate, just wanna it confirmed one way or the other if the swans wanted to keep him

Collingwood obviously thought they did.

 

[Carringbush2010]

Collingwood obviously thought they did.

Correct, it looks now it's check mate in favour of the swans unless this kid plays 22 senior games and has a blinder year and we're contending again.

That's seems to be the strategy from the club, a line breaking back flanker that racks up I50s.................................... in the neafl and seems the club reckons he can do the same at top level, time will tell

 

[left at home]

Surely the club must've have seen something in him, IMHO (humble) I think it's a gamble given he's cat b rookie and hasn't played a senior game after 2 years in the system.

I am confident that CFC knows something we don't and that's why they paid overs or so it seems to us.

So Collingwood this better f***** work, otherwise I'll gladly go up for an assault charge and punch the collective signatory's in the face

Sydney’s back line is pretty good, and difficult to break into.
The lad has only been playing in the back line this year, so still learning his craft.
To every time you draft a kid in it is a risk, reward situation, to me this is no different. He is what we need, and works it is cheap. If not it’s no different than a second round drafted bust

 

[TradeDraft]

I get a Feeling that when Hine likes someone he is happy to pay Overs to make sure they get to Collingwood

 

[Obese Arachnid]

Sydney’s back line is pretty good, and difficult to break into.
The lad has only been playing in the back line this year, so still learning his craft.
To every time you draft a kid in it is a risk, reward situation, to me this is no different. He is what we need, and works it is cheap. If not it’s no different than a second round drafted bust

Just because some team has a good backline doesn't automatically mean anyone not getting a game in that position is good though.

 

[left at home]

Just because some team has a good backline doesn't automatically mean anyone not getting a game in that position is good though.

Did not say it was, but who is he going to beat out after just switching to defence in the swans if he is good though

 

[Saintly Viewed]

Fair enough on Marley but Wells as good as he is he's no good to us if only the park for 9 or 10 games a year - need a minimum 15 if we want to contend

I'm tipping he plays 17 minimum this season

And if so, I know I'm going to be ecstatic

 

[Saintly Viewed]

The spanky spank goes without saying good sir.

Good news then.

Just didn't want a good car going to waste, that's all

 

[TKiL]

FWIW Jon Ralph rates Murray 26/28 for traded players likely to have an impact at their new Club. Says Buckley - not Hine clearly has a plan for Murray. Ablett rated 1 for impact at his "new" club.

 

[Apples]

With Sinclair doubtful for 2018 after soft tissue and concussion injuries ruined his season and Ramsay's future even more in doubt, Murray's selection makes a lot of sense.

Geoff Walsh on NAB Draft Radio last week, suggested Darcy Moore would be tried down back during the pre-season. This would allow Reid to stay forward. Our big weakness this year was our offensive pressure; we were simply second rate once the ball hit inside 50. How to rectify the problem?
If Reid plays permanent CHF with Grundy/Cox at FF, we would still need offensive pressure.

Elliott and Faz are certainties and whilst both are capable of turning a game off their own boots, neither are defensive beasts. How about Goldsack staying forward? It has worked in the past. Now for the remaining spot. There's plenty of love for Kirby and he could well fill a spot, but how about a call from left field? Could Ben Sinclair play forward? He has the pace and the defensive pressure to be considered I reckon. Has Ben ever played forward? Bucks needs to think outside the box in 2018. Provided Sinkers in still on our list going forward, it's worth considering a new role for him.

 

[JJ14AU]

With Sinclair doubtful for 2018 after soft tissue and concussion injuries ruined his season and Ramsay's future even more in doubt, Murray's selection makes a lot of sense.

Geoff Walsh on NAB Draft Radio last week, suggested Darcy Moore would be tried down back during the pre-season. This would allow Reid to stay forward. Our big weakness this year was our offensive pressure; we were simply second rate once the ball hit inside 50. How to rectify the problem?
If Reid plays permanent CHF with Grundy/Cox at FF, we would still need offensive pressure.

Elliott and Faz are certainties and whilst both are capable of turning a game off their own boots, neither are defensive beasts. How about Goldsack staying forward? It has worked in the past. Now for the remaining spot. There's plenty of love for Kirby and he could well fill a spot, but how about a call from left field? Could Ben Sinclair play forward? He has the pace and the defensive pressure to be considered I reckon. Has Ben ever played forward? Bucks needs to think outside the box in 2018. Provided Sinkers in still on our list going forward, it's worth considering a new role for him.

Started as a forward. I still have nightmares of his kicks at goal

 

[regpies]

With Sinclair doubtful for 2018 after soft tissue and concussion injuries ruined his season and Ramsay's future even more in doubt, Murray's selection makes a lot of sense.

Geoff Walsh on NAB Draft Radio last week, suggested Darcy Moore would be tried down back during the pre-season. This would allow Reid to stay forward. Our big weakness this year was our offensive pressure; we were simply second rate once the ball hit inside 50. How to rectify the problem?
If Reid plays permanent CHF with Grundy/Cox at FF, we would still need offensive pressure.

Elliott and Faz are certainties and whilst both are capable of turning a game off their own boots, neither are defensive beasts. How about Goldsack staying forward? It has worked in the past. Now for the remaining spot. There's plenty of love for Kirby and he could well fill a spot, but how about a call from left field? Could Ben Sinclair play forward? He has the pace and the defensive pressure to be considered I reckon. Has Ben ever played forward? Bucks needs to think outside the box in 2018. Provided Sinkers in still on our list going forward, it's worth considering a new role for him.

Sinclair started as a forward, he was utterly hopeless in front of goal and while he provided pressure he would rarely make a tackle stick, most opposition players just shrugged him and continued on