- Joined
- Apr 30, 2000
- Posts
- 1,052
- Reaction score
- 9
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Reading
I wasn't going to comment on this weeks practice games but I now feel compelled to after seeing the headline today. "Dockers fade to hand Cats victory"
NEWSFLASH ; GEELONG WON BY ALMOST 10 GOALS, In may opinion a 10 goal margin is not handing a team victory rather than being thrashed by a BETTER side.
Why are Geelong given absolutely no credit whenever they beat someone? The story was how the Dockers tried hard but in the end weren't good enough because of their lack of depth. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
Add to that, when they defeated Essendon is was all about Essendon injuries, not about how Geelong won.
Even when they lose, there seems to be no mention of Geelong - ie Port Power it was great for Port to win a tough game in Melbourne, Sydney - Sydney controlled the game early and held on to win in terrible condition by 13 points. etc etc
Now this has gone to far - If you are going to report about a match interstate in a Melbourne paper at least report about the team that the majority interested in the match would support.
The fact remains, the Dockers kicked with a four goal wind in the first quarter and still traied at quarter time, Geelong were 3 goals up at half time, they were still that margin ahead at 3qtr time and got out to a 68 point lead before winning by 56. Did you ever think that Geelong kicking with a 4 goal wind in the last quarter may have had something to do with the result?
Add to that, Geelong were without Hocking, Sholl, Kilpatrick, Murphy, Graham and Burns. A bit of credit where it is due please
[This message has been edited by gocatsgo (edited 11 March 2001).]
NEWSFLASH ; GEELONG WON BY ALMOST 10 GOALS, In may opinion a 10 goal margin is not handing a team victory rather than being thrashed by a BETTER side.
Why are Geelong given absolutely no credit whenever they beat someone? The story was how the Dockers tried hard but in the end weren't good enough because of their lack of depth. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
Add to that, when they defeated Essendon is was all about Essendon injuries, not about how Geelong won.
Even when they lose, there seems to be no mention of Geelong - ie Port Power it was great for Port to win a tough game in Melbourne, Sydney - Sydney controlled the game early and held on to win in terrible condition by 13 points. etc etc
Now this has gone to far - If you are going to report about a match interstate in a Melbourne paper at least report about the team that the majority interested in the match would support.
The fact remains, the Dockers kicked with a four goal wind in the first quarter and still traied at quarter time, Geelong were 3 goals up at half time, they were still that margin ahead at 3qtr time and got out to a 68 point lead before winning by 56. Did you ever think that Geelong kicking with a 4 goal wind in the last quarter may have had something to do with the result?
Add to that, Geelong were without Hocking, Sholl, Kilpatrick, Murphy, Graham and Burns. A bit of credit where it is due please
[This message has been edited by gocatsgo (edited 11 March 2001).]








