Are we going to continue to go over this again and again? Grasping on to the Tom Cooper name isn't helping your plight. Is the fact that Cooper has a better ODI and List A average (by a margin) then Warner inadmissible. Perhaps it's the teams he made those runs against that makes it insignificant. Although Warners recent runs came against some easy opposition too. Around and around we go.
Speak for yourself, Stats. I'm not going around and around. I'm standing very, very still. Like a big statue of a man pointing and laughing at you as you do your little tap-dance.
You made a shitty argument, one that is obviously contradictory and self-defeating. No round and round required.
And yes, Cooper's
ODI and List A numbers are absolutely irrelevant. I mean, I'm sure that century he made for Holland against Afghanistan was impressive, but I'm just not sure it commends him as a Test batsman. Call me crazy. Good try, though.
And if you want to do a comparison of who Cooper and Warner scored their FC runs against, I'm sure that would be fascinating. After all, we all know how awesome you are with stats.
Your daftness and inability to move on because I got your knickers in a knot on a thread you derailed and several PM's (that you also derailed and I stopped answering) is not changing anything. Think you have some crusade here to defend yourself? Knock yourself out champ.
Don't get upset, Stats. You're the one who can't answer a really simple question. Most people would look at the fact we had heaps of injuries and the fact Warner scored an unbeaten century and conclude that it was absolutely
not a mistake to pick him. Why are you having trouble with it?
Was it a mistake to pick Warner for Hobart?