But if he received then he is just a publisher, like every other news org..Receiving or stealing - same thing to me. This world would be a poorer place without whistleblowers but I'm just not sure how to categorise him.
The only difference between Wikileaks and the NY times, is he offers the source material, so people can study and make up their own mind. No real propaganda, or bending of stories if someone can point to a document.
It’s also relevant, that people can look back at things, say story about Ukraine, at the time wasnt really important, so news org didn’t report but if you dug thru all the names, etc you can see military build up has been happening for a close to two decades. No one would ever know previously as the information would’ve been lost.
most other large news orgs have followed suit in the same style.