Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
I don't think the upcoming home and away means much, no matter who wins. Its significance is around the finals positions, but as a form guide it wont mean much in September. Any of the top 6 sides could beat each other on their day in a final.You guys sure are talking a big game given you've being completely outclassed and embarrassed the past two times we've played you.
It would be like me challenging a West Coast supporter and thinking they'd be intimidated by us.
It's really quite delusional.
Will melt more if we win another flag!!If they come ninth i think the board will melt down
Year | Club | Used | After 15 games | Finished |
2019 | Me | 38 | 16th* | |
2019 | Ri | 38 | 6th* | |
2018 | Es | 38 | 12th | 11th |
2018 | GC | 39 | 17th | 17th |
2016 | Co | 38 | 11th | 12th |
2016 | GC | 38 | 15th | 15th |
2015 | Ca | 40 | 16th | 18th |
2015 | GC | 40 | 17th | 16th |
2014 | GWS | 40 | 15th | 16th |
2014 | St | 40 | 18th | 18th |
2014 | WB | 39 | 14th | 14th |
2013 | Co | 38 | 7th | 8th |
2013 | GC | 38 | 14th | 14th |
2013 | GWS | 43 | 18th | 18th |
2013 | Me | 38 | 17th | 17th |
2013 | WB | 38 | 15th | 15th |
2012 | GC | 41 | 17th | 17th |
2012 | GWS | 41 | 18th | 18th |
2011 | Br | 38 | 15th | 15th |
2011 | GC | 40 | 16th | 17th |
2011 | WB | 38 | 9th | 10th |
2009 | Fr | 38 | 16th | 14th |
2009 | Ri | 38 | 14th | 15th |
2008 | Fr | 38 | 14th | 14th |
2007 | Me | 38 | 15th | 14th |
2005 | Es | 39 | 14th | 13th |
2001 | St | 39 | 14th | 15th |
1999 | Ad | 38 | 12th | 13th |
1999 | Co | 39 | 16th | 16th |
1995 | Fr | 39 | 13th | 13th |
1994 | Es | 38 | 7th | 10th |
1994 | St | 40 | 14th | 13th |
1993 | Ri | 38 | 13th | 14th |
1993 | Sy | 41 | 15th | 15th |
1992 | Es | 39 | 9th | 8th |
1992 | Me | 38 | 13th | 11th |
1992 | NM | 39 | 11th | 12th |
1991 | Br | 38 | 14th | 15th |
1991 | Ca | 38 | 10th | 11th |
1991 | Ri | 38 | 13th | 13th |
1991 | Fi | 41 | 15th | 14th |
1990 | Br | 41 | 14th | 14th |
1990 | Ca | 39 | 7th | 8th |
1990 | Sy | 41 | 13th | 13th |
1989 | Ca | 41 | 9th | 8th |
1989 | Ri | 38 | 12th | 14th |
1988 | NM | 42 | 10th | 11th |
1988 | WB | 39 | 7th | 8th |
You guys sure are talking a big game given you've being completely outclassed and embarrassed the past two times we've played you.
It would be like me challenging a West Coast supporter and thinking they'd be intimidated by us.
It's really quite delusional.
That's really great.An illustration of the odds stacked against Richmond - most recent teams to use 38 players after 15 games. Finalists in green.
Year Club Used After 15 games Finished 2019 Me 38 16th* 2019 Ri 38 6th* 2018 Es 38 12th 11th 2018 GC 39 17th 17th 2016 Co 38 11th 12th 2016 GC 38 15th 15th 2015 Ca 40 16th 18th 2015 GC 40 17th 16th 2014 GWS 40 15th 16th 2014 St 40 18th 18th 2014 WB 39 14th 14th 2013 Co 38 7th 8th 2013 GC 38 14th 14th 2013 GWS 43 18th 18th 2013 Me 38 17th 17th 2013 WB 38 15th 15th 2012 GC 41 17th 17th 2012 GWS 41 18th 18th 2011 Br 38 15th 15th 2011 GC 40 16th 17th 2011 WB 38 9th 10th 2009 Fr 38 16th 14th 2009 Ri 38 14th 15th 2008 Fr 38 14th 14th 2007 Me 38 15th 14th 2005 Es 39 14th 13th 2001 St 39 14th 15th 1999 Ad 38 12th 13th 1999 Co 39 16th 16th 1995 Fr 39 13th 13th 1994 Es 38 7th 10th 1994 St 40 14th 13th 1993 Ri 38 13th 14th 1993 Sy 41 15th 15th 1992 Es 39 9th 8th 1992 Me 38 13th 11th 1992 NM 39 11th 12th 1991 Br 38 14th 15th 1991 Ca 38 10th 11th 1991 Ri 38 13th 13th 1991 Fi 41 15th 14th 1990 Br 41 14th 14th 1990 Ca 39 7th 8th 1990 Sy 41 13th 13th 1989 Ca 41 9th 8th 1989 Ri 38 12th 14th 1988 NM 42 10th 11th 1988 WB 39 7th 8th
No, it didn't.
It had less to do with the fact we played at the 'G and more to do with the fact their little period of dominance had come to an end.
Which is why I'm not getting overexcited about their chances on the back of two wins against bottom 4 teams.
Whether their remaining games are played at the MCG or not, they simply ain't that good.
Except their past 3 games at the 'G against top 8 teams, where they have lost all 3 with an average losing margin of 50 points...Their record suggests they play better at the G then elsewhere so it’s little wonder they are happy about playing there.
Exactly correct.Except their past 3 games at the 'G against top 8 teams, where they have lost all 3 with an average losing margin of 50 points...
Except their past 3 games at the 'G against top 8 teams, where they have lost all 3 with an average losing margin of 50 points...
Check the outs......certainly not 35 yo and VFL quality unlike your mob.Except their past 3 games at the 'G against top 8 teams, where they have lost all 3 with an average losing margin of 50 points...
At last someone other than a Tigers supporter calls out this guy. Your team is flying and deservedly so.fu** me it’s like talking to a brick wall. Continue your ridiculous melt without me
Apologies for letting facts get in the way of your story. It's no longer late 2017 or early/mid 2018.fu** me it’s like talking to a brick wall. Continue your ridiculous melt without me
Yes, of course.Check the outs......certainly not 35 yo and VFL quality unlike your mob.
Ladder position has nothing to do with it.Exactly correct.
You should have no trouble at all winning against us considering your ladder position.
Of course Riley Dunn is such a loss compared to Rance to name just one. Tiges ins have definitely more upside than poor old Pies. By the way have noticed Nathan has stopped his smiling and isn't footy fun routine. That poor old telephone he uses has copped a hiding of late. Enjoy your next month.See you round whatever....Yes, of course.
Only Richmond have injuries to quality players.
And a Collingwood supporter should know a couple of months is a long time in footballApologies for letting facts get in the way of your story. It's no longer late 2017 or early/mid 2018.
A Brisbane supporter of all people should know a year is a long time in football.
GF v West Coast - Lost by 4
I could argue with you about whether any other team has had such a quality of outs - a Brownlow medalist, the best defender in the league, a three -time Coleman medalist and so on. But it's actually irrelevant to the argument. The point is not whether those outs are unique; it's that they ARE NO LONGER OUT. You keep making the same stale argument that we are bound to lose because we lost there this year. Even if you think that means we have no depth because other teams have managed to cover similar losses, that happens to be irrelevant. Because WE DON'T HAVE TO COVER THOSE LOSSES NOW. Though I don't know why I bother. You're just a Collingwood troll who wants to endlessly wank on about the fact that you beat us in a final for the first time since the 1930s.Yes, of course.
Only Richmond have injuries to quality players.
Assuming we get our mojo back before we meet, you are simply a vastly inferior side. As we have proven the last two times we have met, where the scoreline has actually flattered the Tigers.
One team was on the way up, the other is on the way down.And a Collingwood supporter should know a couple of months is a long time in football
Collingwood at the G vs top 8 teams last year
R2 v GWS - Lost by 16
R6 v Richmond - Lost by 43
R8 v Geelong - Lost by 21
R12 v Melbourne - Won by 42
R17 v West Coast - Lost by 35
R19 v Richmond - Lost by 28
SF v GWS - Won by 10
PF v Richmond - Won by 39
GF v West Coast - Lost by 4
Fair change there
Righto mate, whatever helps you sleep at nightOne team was on the way up, the other is on the way down.
Fair difference there.