Will West Coast roll the dice and play Naitanui next week?

(Log in to remove this ad.)

kaiserchief13

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jul 12, 2011
Posts
21,270
Likes
13,466
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Eagles, Lakers, Bayern, Trojans
#27
Depends how much game time he can get. If he can play 70%+ you'd have to do it I think.

For who? That is the question.

I think LeCras should go. Naitanui provides way more pressure than him.

Also Rioli in for maybe Cripps or Partington
 

Rod Stroker

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 9, 2003
Posts
28,538
Likes
16,505
Location
Singapore / 30,000 feet
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Eagles (NFL), Suns (NBA)
#32
That's great.

Petrie and Vardy have been good. Would be a tough call to squeeze one of them out for an unfit NicNat.

Amazing that a year ago they didn't have a ruckman for this season and had to draft in a couple of rejects. Now they have an embarrassment of riches in the ruck at the right time of the year.
 

kerr87

All Australian
Joined
Sep 22, 2016
Posts
911
Likes
1,629
AFL Club
West Coast
#35
Yes i think he will come in.
Duggan will be dropped and we will go tall and replace him with Naitanui.
Partington also could be dropped for Willie Rioli
Wellingham for Duggan, Rioli for Partington, Naitanui for Lecras.

Role the dice. Need some fresh legs in there.
 

officialjc

Club Legend
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Posts
1,513
Likes
1,305
AFL Club
Adelaide
#36
eagles can possibly get away with another tall because kennedy, darling, vardy, petrie and naiatnui are all decent at ground level. they are not like the lumbering talls from gws (mumford, lobb, patton). spotless doesnt seem too wide a ground. if it doesnt rain, nic nat is a real possibility.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Topkent

Premium Platinum
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
32,256
Likes
38,875
Location
Canada
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Winnipeg Jets
#41
Considering his whole game is beautiful ruck work with some tackling and clearance work I don't see match fitness being an issue. It's not like he relies on marks around the ground or goals to play well
 

Roobs321

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Posts
6,960
Likes
4,239
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Arsenal Sydney Swans GWS CBR United
#42
I'd prefer not to, even though our ruck situation is clearly vulnerable in fourth quarters. If a Grand Final was on the line it would definitely be worth considering, but we're facing four weeks on the road without the form to dare to dream. No point, let him settle for 2018 campaign, we traded in Petrie and Vardy largely for this purpose. Bringing him back to face Mumford seems ill-advised.
 

herculez09

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jun 1, 2009
Posts
7,968
Likes
9,538
Location
Essendon
AFL Club
West Coast
#43
I'd prefer not to, even though our ruck situation is clearly vulnerable in fourth quarters. If a Grand Final was on the line it would definitely be worth considering, but we're facing four weeks on the road without the form to dare to dream. No point, let him settle for 2018 campaign, we traded in Petrie and Vardy largely for this purpose. Bringing him back to face Mumford seems ill-advised.
Why? Mumford was a witches hat the other night.
 

ep2018

Bigfooty Pessimist
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Posts
24,998
Likes
19,991
AFL Club
West Coast
#45
I think it's worth the risk because on the chance they made the final from the easy side of the draw (injury depleted GWS, and Richmond).

Most likely Cats out in sets and Sydney might be tired if they beat the Crows after two huge matches interstate in a row.

Being one of two interstate clubs at the MCG come the GF is well worth it. Bring on Sydney v WC III (.., or Adelaide)
Richmond will flog us if we somehow get past the Giants. And even then the Giant will probably flog us. Two interstate trips in a row will kill us.
 

Damon_3388

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Posts
30,756
Likes
23,477
Location
Headed for Kirribilli House
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Norwood, Everton, Detroit Red Wings
#50
Our ruck IS a problem. Despite a few nice moments, Vardy is rubbish. We've been flogged in the guts all year.

I'd play him. He might help Kennedy not get so mauled as well
Yep, Naitanui changes the whole midfield dynamic for them.

Vardy has been the worst lead ruckman in the league this year in terms of stoppage work, and the Eagles have been behind the 8-ball all year because of it. This is Naitanui's specific strength, not just tap-work, but tackles, clearances, second efforts and bullocking work around the packs, giving the other midfielders greater time and space to do their thing.

One of the first things Luke Shuey mentioned last night in his post-match interview was how Port smashed them in the clearances, and it's not something that will get any easier against a GWS midfield with Shane Mumford, Callan Ward, Dylan Shiel, and Stephen Coniglio, either. If you have the opportunity to not just "create a contest" or "break even", but actually swing things in your favour, why not take it?

If Naitanui is fit to play, and you're not going to play him in a sudden-death must-win, what exactly are you saving him for? What reward will be worth the risk? No final or premiership is worth less than any other. Take a gamble, and do all that you can to put yourself in the best position for glory.
 
Top Bottom