Nooooo i have a dejavu feeling about this, so many break chances 
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Wimbledon 2007
- Thread starter goal sneak
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
What does he have to do to get one?
Federers gonna win this i reckon Rafa is beating himself
Rafa is beating himselfLog in to remove this Banner Ad
0-30 it was obvious
it was obvious
Thats it guys but well played rafa
but well played rafa
Rafa let him escape, i dont believe this
All hail the mighty Federer! 
Rafa has shown he can beat federer on grass, next year he will beat federer. Anyone who understands anything about tennis would agree that rafa was the better player on the day.Tiebreaks depends on luck, rafa had a couple of unfortunate breaks in the tiebreak which helped fed through. Rafa should have won this in straight sets
Rafa >> Federer, don't care what anyone says. Rafa outplayed him today and should've won.
Next year Rafa, next year. Nadal's hunting you down on your own turf Roger, look out.
Next year Rafa, next year.
Nadal's hunting you down on your own turf Roger, look out.
Rafa >> Federer, don't care what anyone says. Rafa outplayed him today and should've won.
Next year Rafa, next year.
for a 20 year old guy only playing his 2nd wimbledon, he has shown a hell lot that that fed did at this age.He will win wimbledon next year
He's proved no such thing. The only thing he's proved is that he's a danger to Federer on grass but still in the end couldn't get the job done. There is no such thing as luck and when the pressure was on, when the game was on the line, Federer stood tall like all true champions do.
he was the better player on the day.Look at the statistics. You dont believe tiebreaks are not a matter of luck? Anyone who understands anything about tennis will admit it. Bring on the hardcourts
Save yourself the headache. Anyone who knows anything about sport knows that you can't be "the better player on the day" and lose.
Nadal fans in here were claiming people weren't giving him the credit he deserved, and now they show their complete lack of class by doing the same thing to Federer.
There's no such thing as luck.
You'd think Federer won all three sets through tie breaks the way you're going on
Federer
Wimbledon Champion 2007
Wimbledon Champion 2007
Great match from Nadal. In the end he just wasn't good enough. Got to admire the guy.
- Banned
- #417
Federer deserved to win. what a legend this guy is, Nadal missing a lot of break point opportunties is not unlucky.
There's no such thing as luck.
You'd think Federer won all three sets through tie breaks the way you're going on
Federer
Wimbledon Champion 2007
Great match from Nadal. In the end he just wasn't good enough. Got to admire the guy.
How many times did federer break nadal before the final set(except the first game of the match)? ??? answer... ZERO.Rafa was the better player, had more winners, less unforced errors. Federers serve worked wonders for him, but rafa was better on the ground
Actually he broke him in the first game of the match. But don't let facts get in the way of a good whing.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
4th Wimbledon. Anyone who knows anything about tennis would know that.
how about you read what i wrote properly first??????
What, Federer won? Wow, another unpredictable tennis tournament over
Mens tennis is now more boring than when it was Williams v Williams every final
Mens tennis is now more boring than when it was Williams v Williams every final
So Federer never broke Nadal if you don't count all the games he did break Nadal.
Yep I can see your point
I wanted to take the high road here and show the class that Nadal fans seemingly lack. But the whinging in here is too immense.
Nadal fans:
Nadal fans:
So Federer never broke Nadal if you don't count all the games he did break Nadal.
Yep I can see your point
yep but he didnt break nadal for 2 hours 45 minutes. Do you get my point now??