LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Surely this is the worst Wimbledon final in history.
Bouchard's final still has that record surely. Was that bad!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Surely this is the worst Wimbledon final in history.
In terms of scoreline the last one sided final:Surely this is the worst Wimbledon final in history.
In terms of scoreline the last one sided final:
2002 Hewitt def nalbandian 6-1, 6-3, 6-2
This is why I can dislike Bo5 on some days
Whats the point of playing the 3rd set. We know what going to happen.
Feel sorry for Anderson.
McEnroe-Lewis?In terms of scoreline the last one sided final:
2002 Hewitt def nalbandian 6-1, 6-3, 6-2
I had to look that up:McEnroe-Lewis?
I like Bo3 because every set is important.Best of 3 is worse...at least best of 5 gives the player some hope to come back
I like Bo3 because every set is important.
Don't get me wrong. I not a Ben Rothenberg and want the men to start playing Bo3. I just dislike how long it can take when we know what going to happen. It is why I never watch the early rounds of the favourites on the men's side. Its a waste of time.
Surely this is the worst Wimbledon final in history.
Bouchard's final still has that record surely. Was that bad!
Oh yeah that was fun to watch if you were not going for Bouchard. She was just destroyed.
Maybe 5 set tiebreakers should happen but only if the final set is 12-12.
Very interesting statistic would be to see the distance covered between the 2 in their respective semi finals. My guess is that djokovic covered more distance.Or we can leave it as it is. Novak looks fine and his match would have been a lot more taxing! I mean most of the games in the Isner match you had maybe 2 points where it wasn't a big serve.
Very interesting statistic would be to see the distance covered between the 2 in their respective semi finals. My guess is that djokovic covered more distance.