ItsGameTime
Cancelled
- Jan 29, 2013
- 4,520
- 2,659
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Lol and letting Kyrgios sway you hahahahaha
Kyrgios didn't sway me. I've hated Djokovic for years now. Hate that campaigner Nadal as well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol and letting Kyrgios sway you hahahahaha
Kyrgios didn't sway me. I've hated Djokovic for years now. Hate that campaigner Nadal as well.
You think he's going to be moving like that in his mid 30s? There'll be a natural decline in his ability to play so defensively all the time. It's happened to Federer, it's already happened to Nadal... he's no exception.
Tennis is a funny game. Need to look in the context of a game. Federer gets ace and unforced error in his serving suddenly it’s 15-15. Djokovic spaced his points and suddenly by the three tie breaks he’s got 21 extra point whereas Federer May have got 12 or so.
How is Nadal an obstacle? He beat him in the SF and has won the past 6 of 7 against him, all happening on a non-clay court. Federer will always remain a chance to nab one here or there if he keeps on going deep in tournaments like this, especially if Djoker gets bundled out early (which has happened even when he was better). You say he will be 40+ by then but just remember this man had two match points on his racquet against an ATG just a few weeks shy of his 38 birthday.but who will be there pushing him then? Federer has Nadal & Djokovic as an obstacle. Djokovic will have most of the folks already in the game who mentally disintegrate against him. Yes, Djokovic has this unbelievable ability to make you play an extra shot which is an asset that may decline, but I'd put more of a wager of Djokovic winning another 5 majors in the next 2-3 years than Federer winning another in that time. Federer's will be 40+ by then. He needs to win the immediate US & AUS to get a buffer because I think he's done after that.
There are no guarantees in sport.You are going to hate it in 2-3 years when they take over the Slam records
Eating the grass ...bit of a knob performance that one.
It would have been Feds greatest win.
Can’t beleive he lost it like he did when 40/15 on serve
He got lucky today. Federer, an almost 38 year old, had him on toast. There's no guarantee he'll win the USO or AO. Eventually father time will curb his defensive wall. He'll probably fall just short. Upsets also happen etc.
Federer lost... Well I am just glad that the crowd booed Djokovic. Deserved that and more.
At least Kyrgios understands it...
Wtf. Djokovic approaches the umpire because the hawk eye called it in, even though the point wasn’t over. He had every right too. They then had to replay the point.Federer lost... Well I am just glad that the crowd booed Djokovic. Deserved that and more.
Crazy effort for a 38 year old, Novak is a god.
Imagine Tennis without Novak, Fed and Rafa, They really should cancel the sport for a decade to mourn.
How is Nadal an obstacle? He beat him in the SF and has won the past 6 of 7 against him, all happening on a non-clay court. Federer will always remain a chance to nab one here or there if he keeps on going deep in tournaments like this, especially if Djoker gets bundled out early (which has happened even when he was better). You say he will be 40+ by then but just remember this man had two match points on his racquet against an ATG just a few weeks shy of his 38 birthday.
Five slams is still hard to make up regardless who is trying to do it. That assumes Federer doesn't sneak in one or two more either.I can taste your fear.
Then there are three majors on court where Federer has his number. Federer is never going to win the FO with Nadal still playing there, so that's not exactly anything new.considering 1 major is on clay, you have to say that Nadal is indeed an obstacle particularly as Nadal has his measure on that surface.
yes, he's a chance to nab one, but needs to nab one or two of the next couple IMO. Djokovic wins the US, and there's a good chance the King of Oz gets to 18 by end of January.
errrrr...he is kinda right. Not about Novak only winning because of it but how the competition is weak.I had one dolt friend today tell me that Novak is only winning because the competition is currently weak.
The three greatest players of all time are currently going around and he said the competition is weak.
Can’t make it up.
The fact Nadal has already beaten Federer on his own court demonstrates why. There’s no easy matches for Federer. Doesn’t exactly has Nadal’s number. I’d consider Federer a GOAT if he ever beat Nadal on Clay. That’s the obstacle. Nadal has done well his head to head in finals at Wimbledon at 1-2.Then there are three majors on court where Federer has his number. Federer is never going to win the FO with Nadal still playing there, so that's not exactly anything new.
Or don’t bother and follow the ashes!That was a long 2 weeks. Very good 2 weeks. But long......
It's going to take me a month and a half to get my sleep cycle back to normal.
errrrr...he is kinda right. Not about Novak only winning because of it but how the competition is weak.
lets ignore the big 3. superstars, GOATS etc etc etc. But to win Wimbledon, Novak beat a 37-year-old in 5 sets and.............
Who else is there......Only 1 current player can break apart the big 3 . that is Thiem at the French. We can't complain about how boring the men's side was until the semi and then say the competition is strong because he beat one fantastic player.
I remember when this GOAT discussion was young and the common complaint about Federer was that he had no competition.....At least he had Safin, Hewitt and Roddick....