Remove this Banner Ad

Wimbledon

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Puzzled as to why it is Carlton supporters who have the problem with Lleyton in this thread.

I'll be cheering for the Aussie as I always do ..... unless it is Anthony Mundine but that's another issue entirely.
 
eastaugh36 said:
If you are not going to talk about tennis apart from lame posts such as this then get the hell out of the thread. ****head.

BTW, I know it is hard to talk footy when you support such a pathetic excuse for a team, but please go and try. :)

What a childish response.

The fact is good player or not, Hewitt, like Shane Warne, comes across as a complete and utter tosser and has no likeable qualities to him as a bloke whatsoever. In fact I remember a poll being down at the Aussie Open (Do you want Lleyton to lose) and more people voted for yes than no.
So I am not in the minority here.
Lleyton is a loser.
 
The Old Dark Navy's said:
Puzzled as to why it is Carlton supporters who have the problem with Lleyton in this thread.

I'll be cheering for the Aussie as I always do ..... unless it is Anthony Mundine but that's another issue entirely.


Oddly enough, I'm a Mundine fan I like his no bull#%# approach.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

toulairene said:
Not a fan of Lleytons antics, huge fan of his tennis ability.

As far as Tennis goes Pete Sampras was the total package.

With none of the crap that Hewitt or Mcenroe bring to the court.
BTW FWIW I think Federer will turn out to be a greater player than Sampras.
 
celtic_pride said:
What a childish response.

The fact is good player or not, Hewitt, like Shane Warne, comes across as a complete and utter tosser and has no likeable qualities to him as a bloke whatsoever. In fact I remember a poll being down at the Aussie Open (Do you want Lleyton to lose) and more people voted for yes than no.
So I am not in the minority here.
Lleyton is a loser.

You tender little soul you. Grow some balls.
 
bunsen burner said:
You go on like a girl. One minute you're saying Ablett isn't a great player because of his off field behaviour, then it's Shane Warne isn't a great player, and now you're all high and mighty about Hewitt. I have no problems if people don't like Hewitt (it's quite understandable) but people like you who's morals are the primary criteria for judging sports players rather than their sporting deeds is laughable.

You remind me of Rebecca Wilson.

Exactly.
 
celtic_pride said:
What a childish response.

The fact is good player or not, Hewitt, like Shane Warne, comes across as a complete and utter tosser and has no likeable qualities to him as a bloke whatsoever. In fact I remember a poll being down at the Aussie Open (Do you want Lleyton to lose) and more people voted for yes than no.
So I am not in the minority here.
Lleyton is a loser.

They are champions on the field but off the field they are totally different.
 
spring6 said:
No, Leyton is a muti millionaire, grand slam winning, beautiful girl dating, champion. If he never again wins a game of tennis, it is fair to say he is a winner.


Okay Lleyton is a tosser then.
:D
 
druggie pimp burner said:
You go on like a girl. One minute you're saying Ablett isn't a great player because of his off field behaviour, then it's Shane Warne isn't a great player, and now you're all high and mighty about Hewitt. I have no problems if people don't like Hewitt (it's quite understandable) but people like you who's morals are the primary criteria for judging sports players rather than their sporting deeds is laughable.

You remind me of Rebecca Wilson.
Warne is a dead set champion ..and for you not to realise this is pretty understandable ..i guess your drug ********ed brain is a little slow most days . i support who i want to support and i don't need a moron low life pimp like telling me who i should and shouldn't support go and crawl back into your hole .
 
Blues_Man said:
Warne is a dead set champion ..and for you not to realise this is pretty understandable ..
Not too bright are you?

1. I've always maintained Warne is a champion
2. You on the other hand haven't. At different times you've stated that Warne and Ablett are not worthy of champion status because of their off field indiscretions. Or do you deny that?

ps I'm surprised you haven't been calling for Shane Warne's axing from the Australian team on moral grounds.


i guess your drug ********ed brain is a little slow most days .
Ho hum. This line of insult is getting boring.
 
bunsen burner said:
Not too bright are you?

1. I've always maintained Warne is a champion
2. You on the other hand haven't. At different times you've stated that Warne and Ablett are not worthy of champion status because of their off field indiscretions. Or do you deny that?

ps I'm surprised you haven't been calling for Shane Warne's axing from the Australian team on moral grounds.


Ho hum. This line of insult is getting boring.
look lay off the drugs for a while and you will understand what people are saying ..instead of jumping in and looking like a complete moron every time you post
1 i believe Gary Ablett is an absolute champion footballer ...one of the best i have ever seen play the game .
2 Shane Warne is the best leg spinner to ever play the game
what part of these statements is your drug ********ed brain having trouble processing ??
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Blues_Man said:
look lay off the drugs for a while and you will understand what people are saying ..instead of jumping in and looking like a complete moron every time you post
1 i believe Gary Ablett is an absolute champion footballer ...one of the best i have ever seen play the game .
2 Shane Warne is the best leg spinner to ever play the game
what part of these statements is your drug ********ed brain having trouble processing ??
Maybe I got you mixed up with someone else but I'm still not convinced you're not the person I've had arguments over Warne and Ablett with in the past.
 
Quarter final results so far:

Federer 7-5 6-2 7-6 (7-2) Gonzalez
Hewitt 7-5 6-4 7-6 (7-2) Lopez

Lleyton now just one (very difficult) win away from his third slam final in the last 12 months. :)
 
scout said:
Geez, how Aussie biased is are these tv commentators. Not everyone wants Lleyton to win. And there are actually two players on the court.
Yeah, Newk is a shocker. Hard to listen with him sucking arse constantly
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

cruiser said:
Am looking forward to watching Lleyton play in the semi final on Friday, hopefully against Federer. Go Lleyton!!! C"MON!!!!
bit slow following the post 2 before yours?

it really is a disgrace that Hewitt has to face Federer in a semi. ok, fair enough he wasn't 2nd seed. but to be demoted to 3rd seed then have to face the #1 seed is ridiculous. that means the 4th seed gets an easier match than the 3rd seed.

definitely should be 1v4, 2v3.
 
Federer seemed to give his opponent a few more chances than usual today, some hope for Lleyton on Friday night

Grosjean took the first set against Roddick, Johansson has had 9 break points to 2 but they've both converted one and it's 5-5 in the first. Both second serve percentages are in the 30s, Nalbandian has served 58 times to Johansson's 34
 
(1) Federer v (3) Hewitt
(2) Roddick v (12) Johansson

Again I say it's ridiculous that Hewitt has to play Federer in the semis.
 
Thats Power said:
As much as i want lleyton to win, i cant see how though.He will be lucky enough to get a set IMO.Just dont concede a bagel lleyton :eek:

Federer has to lose some time I guess. You would rather be facing him when he is on a streak like this IMO. Hewitt has nothing to lose. Win and he has knocked off one of the hottest players ever.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Wimbledon

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top