- May 28, 2013
- 25,326
- 27,151
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Seattle Seahawks
The annual all to early winners and losers 2022 edition.
Review Winners and losers 2022 draft
- Thread starter Wild Bill
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Jul 15, 2022
- 2,382
- 2,347
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Banned
- #2
StKilda smashed it.
diddley1984
The biggest horse in all of Norway
- Sep 8, 2017
- 193
- 311
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
I don’t know if the saints are winners, but I am wrapped with our swag.
In before someone posts "let's discuss in 10 years time" and ruin the thread.
The Filth Wizard
Just here for the zipline
- Jul 26, 2007
- 93,692
- 162,618
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Arsenal, Coney Island Warriors
- Moderator
- #7
Not sure about Keeler but if he gets it together it's been a real solid draft for the Saints.
The Filth Wizard
Just here for the zipline
- Jul 26, 2007
- 93,692
- 162,618
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Arsenal, Coney Island Warriors
- Moderator
- #9
You had fun doing it though.
WC easily, great picks
Saints, all xfactor types, but could be a great draft if they come close to their potential
Then the Hawks
Saints, all xfactor types, but could be a great draft if they come close to their potential
Then the Hawks
Very happy Blue
Hollands will be a gun
Cowan is AFL ready and tough
Binns is another elite outside runner
Lemmy is raw but has time
Given our list and where we are at they are great additions
The top 3 could easily play and influence 2023
Hollands will be a gun
Cowan is AFL ready and tough
Binns is another elite outside runner
Lemmy is raw but has time
Given our list and where we are at they are great additions
The top 3 could easily play and influence 2023
Eagles, Saints, Hawks have done very well for mine and of course roos
SSSSSS
Brownlow Medallist
- Apr 18, 2011
- 19,431
- 41,819
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Six decades of domination
Very happy with our haul but think Saints smashed it from a pure value POV.
Poo and Hotton absolutely wow. Keeler has so much upside. They'd be grinning.
Poo and Hotton absolutely wow. Keeler has so much upside. They'd be grinning.
Harlequin Dream
Club Legend
- Dec 19, 2016
- 1,719
- 2,160
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Memphis Grizzlies
Winners are Hawthorn for knowing who they want and trading in for them.
Losers are Hawthorn for losing most of next year's hand in a rebuilding year.
They have made some very important decisions. Will be interesting to see if it pays off.
Losers are Hawthorn for losing most of next year's hand in a rebuilding year.
They have made some very important decisions. Will be interesting to see if it pays off.
SSSSSS
Brownlow Medallist
- Apr 18, 2011
- 19,431
- 41,819
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Six decades of domination
Some clubs displayed a clear drafting strategy which I found interesting.
Eagles clear strategy of pace and power through the stoppage.
Hawthorn loading up on big players with the scope of playing in the middle .
Blues getting a lot of hard running machines.
Eagles clear strategy of pace and power through the stoppage.
Hawthorn loading up on big players with the scope of playing in the middle .
Blues getting a lot of hard running machines.
Eagle blues saints did very well. Sydney confuses me but wait and see on how they turn out + Hawthorns picks next year
Sent from my SM-N985F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Sent from my SM-N985F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Winners:
Carlton:
Hollands is quality and fills a need, Cowan too, Binns - I love the double up of attacking a need aggressively, and Lemmey is a great value pick. If he fails, fine, if he succeeds everyone will look silly for dropping him down so far.
North:
I don't really love the first 2 but they're very good, George a great value buy, and Cooper Harvey IMO can play.
West Coast:
Brand new midfield in one draft that should all play fairly quickly, plus a nice value small forward
St Kilda:
Phillipou an absolute steal, then took some high upside talls and got a nice slider in Hotton
Losers:
Not sure there's too many.
Maybe Freo - just not sure they maximised that hand of picks in the 30's and 40's. But they have a fairly stacked list so I get it.
GWS - Cadman's fantastic of course. Just a question of whether they maximised the other 4 picks. I think they've done ok, but it will be interesting to see if Jones does become a quality small forward if he's used in that role. Konstantly and Clarke being right there and not getting either of them is interesting. Rowston looks a good player but they just didn't get maximum value. Be interesting to see where Gruzewski fits. I like the McMullin pick.
A lot of teams, including my own, only have the 1-2 picks. I know they can grab more in the rookie and SSP but I think these kids can play and it was a deeper draft than first reported.
Carlton:
Hollands is quality and fills a need, Cowan too, Binns - I love the double up of attacking a need aggressively, and Lemmey is a great value pick. If he fails, fine, if he succeeds everyone will look silly for dropping him down so far.
North:
I don't really love the first 2 but they're very good, George a great value buy, and Cooper Harvey IMO can play.
West Coast:
Brand new midfield in one draft that should all play fairly quickly, plus a nice value small forward
St Kilda:
Phillipou an absolute steal, then took some high upside talls and got a nice slider in Hotton
Losers:
Not sure there's too many.
Maybe Freo - just not sure they maximised that hand of picks in the 30's and 40's. But they have a fairly stacked list so I get it.
GWS - Cadman's fantastic of course. Just a question of whether they maximised the other 4 picks. I think they've done ok, but it will be interesting to see if Jones does become a quality small forward if he's used in that role. Konstantly and Clarke being right there and not getting either of them is interesting. Rowston looks a good player but they just didn't get maximum value. Be interesting to see where Gruzewski fits. I like the McMullin pick.
A lot of teams, including my own, only have the 1-2 picks. I know they can grab more in the rookie and SSP but I think these kids can play and it was a deeper draft than first reported.
Winners based on talent rankings: Eagles, Dons, Saints, Carlton, North.
Losers based on talent: Swans, Tigers, Port.
Winners based on list needs: Eagles, Saints, Dogs.
Losers based on list needs: Dons? still no big bodied mid?
Losers based on talent: Swans, Tigers, Port.
Winners based on list needs: Eagles, Saints, Dogs.
Losers based on list needs: Dons? still no big bodied mid?
Hawks still have a pick in every round next year
Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
Carlton clearly went for athletic attributes thats for sure. If it comes off it will be very good.
Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
Ports talls are mostly ageing so they need talls
Ours was apart from pure talent, speed. Think all 4 would be sub-3 seconds for the 20m sprint. Including Hotton and Van Es both being around 2.92sec. Phillipou 2.99 and Keeler looks very quick for his size.
North got my faves other than mackenzie
Eagles did really well if I look at how you rebuild
Saints and hawks not too shabby either.
Blues should be happy with the picks
Dons went alright. Cant have asked for more with a davey bid that late and munkara as a freebie.
Whatever worth phantom drafts have - other than jayden, all our picks at one point were top 20 rated
Eagles did really well if I look at how you rebuild
Saints and hawks not too shabby either.
Blues should be happy with the picks
Dons went alright. Cant have asked for more with a davey bid that late and munkara as a freebie.
Whatever worth phantom drafts have - other than jayden, all our picks at one point were top 20 rated
