- May 14, 2017
- 11,431
- 12,823
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- West Adelaide
Good team, btw.Hmmm... Khawaja
How about Travis Head (C)?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good team, btw.Hmmm... Khawaja
Would be a bold call IMOGood team, btw.
How about Travis Head (C)?
This (although doubt it was hubris).Anyway. Far too little attention had been paid to the six Boult carried onto the rope. That smacked of hubris and/or total lack of awareness. Any other action there and NZ win.
Personally I would make Travis Head Captain, which would allow us to bring in Carey as keeper who is a matchwinner.My best mate came over last Sunday night to watch the cricket. He suggested that Smith will forever be tarnished by the ball-tampering incident, like a ghost or shadow hanging over him for the rest of his life. He might be right.
Then he said that the only thing Smith could do to lessen the damage going forward was to make a megaton of runs for the rest of his career and get his Test batting average close to 70, if not over that (possible with some big not out scores). Then he'd be remembered as "The Aussie second only to Bradman", so:
--- after his failure of leadership, do you think the selectors want Smith back as Captain, and
--- do you reckon he'd even want the job?
To my eye, Smith has an almost OCD-obsession to bat and make runs. His best chance to do that might be without the Captaincy in future.
Hasn't been an issue at state level.Would be a bold call IMO
Not sure he's ready for the added pressure
Carey & Paine basically have identical 1st class averages.Carey has a poor FC record doesn't he? Not sure why he'd get in over Paine
Carey has a poor FC record doesn't he? Not sure why he'd get in over Paine
Didn't he Captain Queensland? but, yeah, doesn't inspire me. Too laconic, lacks tactical nouse when batting, fails to sum up a situation and know when to have a red-hot go.Khawaja has never been a captain at state level & doesn't appear the eadership type.
Why don't they have 5 day tests?Hearty CONGRATS to our women's team for retaining the Ashes!!
It was laughable to hear Healy and Skthelar speculate intricately about when Australia might declare , to set England a chaseable target while trying to bowl them out a second time to win the match .
Why would they?
Oz had only to draw, to retain the Ashes.
After dominating the Poms for 3 days and having 2/3rds of a day washed out by Pommie "Summer" rain, the Aussies were never going to offer the Poms a sniff to get back into the series, which they proved by batting to a draw. It was a show of demoralising dominance, Waugh-like (war-like? ) foot on the throat, giving them no chance at all. Excellent.
I think it’s to do with injury prevention. Females are more likely to have injuries if playing the same duration as the men. This would be my guess, similar to tennis where females play best out of 3 sets instead of 5 sets for the men.Why don't they have 5 day tests?
With only one scheduled, surely they could spare another day?
Sent from my MI PAD 4 using Tapatalk
Really? I personally couldn't see it being much different.I think it’s to do with injury prevention. Females are more likely to have injuries if playing the same duration as the men. This would be my guess, similar to tennis where females play best out of 3 sets instead of 5 sets for the men.
I didn't realise they play 100 overs a day!Really? I personally couldn't see it being much different.
They play 100 overs a day so 10 more than men. Surely that would be more detrimental?
Sent from my MI PAD 4 using Tapatalk
JW, mate, seriously?I think it’s to do with injury prevention. Females are more likely to have injuries if playing the same duration as the men. This would be my guess, similar to tennis where females play best out of 3 sets instead of 5 sets for the men.
Well that didn't lastIreland pi**ing all their good work down the drain in the run chase - 8/36
The initial question made by treeman was "why doesn't the Women's Test play out in 5 days?". My thoughts were possibly to do with injury prevention, particularly stress fractures commonly seen in fast bowling. Can't think of any other significant reasons.JW, mate, seriously?
Mate, they play 100-over Test days as opposed to the men's 90. Nothing about more-likely-to-get-injured in that.
Having said that, I do not understand why females play best-of-three for the same prizemoney as the men who play best-of-five.
Anybody know why?
Edit: oops, just saw treeman's post, apologies treeman