Starc's 1/27 from a stumps total of 31!Haselwood 2/2 from 4 overs
Starc 1/27 from 4 overs
Thank god Mitch Marsh didn't score much.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Starc's 1/27 from a stumps total of 31!Haselwood 2/2 from 4 overs
Starc 1/27 from 4 overs
Also Ben Rutten kicked three goals with his first three kicks in AFL football
Also Ben Rutten kicked three goals with his first three kicks in AFL football
Also Ben Rutten kicked three goals with his first three kicks in AFL football
I would play both on this wicket & manage Siddle too.Yay! Coin toss in 20minutes!
Hazlewood or Starc, we will find out then!
30minutes later: Nope. More rain.
I would play both on this wicket & manage Siddle too.
This will give us choices for the 3rd Test.
More a reason to play Starc as he is the one likely to cause a massive batting collapse if conditions are bowler friendly.It is Hazlewood that is in, apparently.
Yeah, I get where you are coming from. With 5 tests in 6 weeks, they have been talking about rotating the bowlers, so maybe there is a general rotating plan already in place, with allowance for pitch conditions.
Since Hazlewood, Pattinson and Starc are just recently back from injury they will need to rotate and monitor workloads.
With the rain forecast for Friday and Saturday too, in all likelihood this test won't matter much! Play 2.5 days for a draw.
No issue with Hazelwood as has a good record at Lords... but should have been replacing Siddle with either Starc or Pattinson playing imo.The selectors get plenty of credit for the first test - backed in Wade and were rewarded. Backed in Pattinson and were rewarded. Backed in Siddle and were rewarded.
Apart from Bancroft, pretty much all their calls (which were criticised heavily beforehand) worked out.
I wonder if that success has emboldened them here and they've outsmarted themselves? Hazelwood had success here before but that was years ago and he has looked fairly ordinary for a while now.
Pattinson looked dangerous and bats well plus there was a decent break between tests. Surely rotation doesn't factor in for Test #2?
Shane Warne agrees with you! And Siddle's first pretty ordinary.No issue with Hazelwood as has a good record at Lords... but should have been replacing Siddle with either Starc or Pattinson playing imo.
2 early wickets including their best in Root... so pressure on Denly to keep his spot.Hazelwood bowling beautifully.
That's looking like a good call. We're looking a bit pedestrian here.No issue with Hazelwood as has a good record at Lords... but should have been replacing Siddle with either Starc or Pattinson playing imo.
Ussy takes a sitter off Siddle, they’re 3/40, Siddle is away, Burns is gone and we’re in to Buttler.That's looking like a good call. We're looking a bit pedestrian here.
We have 2 bowling enforcers in the squad, yet we pick neither & go for 2 steady bowlers instead.That's looking like a good call. We're looking a bit pedestrian here.