- Oct 3, 2009
- 2,280
- 3,460
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Well winning a flag has nothing to do with her.
Clarko and the players are why Hawks won multiple flags,not Kennett .
Its both sad and funny that you think this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well winning a flag has nothing to do with her.
Clarko and the players are why Hawks won multiple flags,not Kennett .
Ben Gale is the executive in charge and made the decision.
Peggy's (and women's generally) role/influence/outlook are fantastic assets to the club. But the basic premise of the OP is sexist and reduces the inputs of intelligent male leaders to that of locker room jocks with no sophistication or emotional intelligence. What a very sad, limited concept of masculinity.
Its both sad and funny that you think this.
What an idiotic thing to say.None of which wins you games of football and Grand Finals.
really ?
What opinion do you want to debate exactly?
I was going to reply with some well thought out and logical arguments to debunk your statement but then I was reminded by what my Grandfather said...
"Do not argue with idiots because they will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience"
So, in a village full of idiots you would be the village idiot.
The one where the President is a figurehead that has nothing to do with football decisions outside having some possible input on a coach that leads to winning and flags.
The AFL world is one dominated by Alpha males.
In this world, the culture breeds a reality were you must always put on a pretense of being strong, your only goal must be to win at all costs, you must try and ignore your pain and fears, talking about your feelings is weak. By some twist of fate, and by luck mostly, a woman for the first time in history is president of an AFL club. It is not a mere coincidence, that these feminine qualities of vulnerability have become a key priority and they have been prioritized by a woman, Peggy O'neal. Is it fair to say that this would not and could not have been embraced in the historically male oriented environment?
Authenticity
Vulnerability
Connection
driven as key prioirites of the club, owned and lived by the coach and the captain by Dimma and Cotch, on the direction of Peggy, through Benny has made all the difference.
The absence of a stoic male at the helm has opened up the opportunity to use these soft skills as a competitive advantage through
a purpose mindset - their belief in something
a connection mindset - authenticity , vulnerability
a performance mindset - not to be sabotaged by their fear of failure
All driven by Ben Crowe and Emma Murray
There is no doubt this strategy has worked, the question is, would a man at the helm have had the courage to actually endorse it ?
I suggest you read this to educate yourself
The role Crowe played in Cotchin, Richmond turnaround
How the Tigers changed their mindset.www.sen.com.au
You must be reading your world famous Richmond flip flop moods into my words.
You know, the tantys and throwing the baby out with the bath water thing you guys do when something goes wrong.
Our fan base isn't fickle or feral like yours.
We made a GF this year. I watched it, we got spanked.
The AFL world is one dominated by Alpha males.
In this world, the culture breeds a reality were you must always put on a pretense of being strong, your only goal must be to win at all costs, you must try and ignore your pain and fears, talking about your feelings is weak. By some twist of fate, and by luck mostly, a woman for the first time in history is president of an AFL club. It is not a mere coincidence, that these feminine qualities of vulnerability have become a key priority and they have been prioritized by a woman, Peggy O'neal. Is it fair to say that this would not and could not have been embraced in the historically male oriented environment?
Authenticity
Vulnerability
Connection
driven as key prioirites of the club, owned and lived by the coach and the captain by Dimma and Cotch, on the direction of Peggy, through Benny has made all the difference.
The absence of a stoic male at the helm has opened up the opportunity to use these soft skills as a competitive advantage through
a purpose mindset - their belief in something
a connection mindset - authenticity , vulnerability
a performance mindset - not to be sabotaged by their fear of failure
All driven by Ben Crowe and Emma Murray
There is no doubt this strategy has worked, the question is, would a man at the helm have had the courage to actually endorse it ?
Are you talking about the AFLW GF?
Never have fans suffered an era when the afl's most dominant team of the time been as insufferable as the present. I long for the days when Hawthorn were winning premiership after premiership.
Well I thought we were talking about women?
Because people like you don't like the reality of it.
Men and women undoubtedly have different genetic strengths and weaknesses in a general level. However when it comes to a person intelligent enough to have been a lawyer in multiple fields and then CEO of a major company, that relatively minor stuff falls by the wayside.So do you think that men and woman on average do not have different strengths and weaknesses?
Because if you do, this is not backed by science.
No its sad for you, and funny for me.
I assume its just coincidence that Richmond were poorly ran offield and hence had a poorly funded FD and were crap for the best part of 35 years, we turned it around offield then magically 4-5 years later we are a success. I'll give you a small hint there is no coincidence, I would have thought after the last 15 years Carlton supporters would get that hence why I found it funny.
Upgrading from a few dud ruckmen in 2016 to a highly competent one in 2017 made a bigger difference than anything coming from the President.
The first part is fair enough, but you don't have to read it.Need to get these wanky self-congratulating Richmond threads off the main board ASAP.
FWIW Paul Roos brought mindfulness in to the Swans prior to their 2012 premiership, and probably to Melbourne too, so Richmond aren’t the first club to embrace it as a performance tool/strategy.
Are you laughing at my nephew.... or the fact that women are rounder, which makes the football club more enjoyable sfellow sfellow.We are talking about football clubs here, quite masculine places as a rule. I had a nephew drafted a few years back and the 'masculinity' pretty much forced him out. I think the OP's premise of having women in certain roles have made the Richmond football club a more rounded place.
Men and women undoubtedly have different genetic strengths and weaknesses in a general level. However when it comes to a person intelligent enough to have been a lawyer in multiple fields and then CEO of a major company, that relatively minor stuff falls by the wayside.
People who make it that far and do what she has done have controlled their emotions, and allowed themselves to make both empathetic and tough decisions. People who don't learn to do that either don't get to that level, fail spectacularly, or are protected by outside forces (rich friends for example).
Men can be as equally empathetic as women, and women can be as equally tactless as men (using the standard example everyone likes to use). Peggy does not make company decisions based on her period, whether she is more emotional, whether she likes shopping, or any of those sorts of things that can be linked in some way to genetics.
Says absolutely nothing about adding Prestia, Nankervis, Caddy etc at that time nor how that was the catalyst that turned their fortunes around on the field.
So forgive me if I prefer to go with the view that it was actual players that improved the squad's success.
The first part is fair enough, but you don't have to read it.
All clubs have been doing it up to a point I imagine, Richmond just embraced it further. Not only about Richmond, more the changing dynamics of modern football.