- Thread starter
- #126
Added new pictures for the Brisbane Bullets, Cairns Taipens, Melbourne Tigers and Melbourne United.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It labels the teams more that they are now. With the clubs being only seven seasons old many people won't know who is who, and with the colours usually associated with states not being used by clubs from those states the usual association won't happen. The pants of players give a lot of space to label the clubs.Really like the idea for the pants.
I have added the Melbourne Tigers and Welllington. I have re-added the Canberra Cannons before, but that received little support. With the NBL being eight teams now and looking to go to twelve teams, I would go with an extra Melbourne team, a second New Zealand team from Wellington, another team from the East Coast of Australia like a Canberra or Gold Coast or second Sydney team, and a second team out of Perth.
Before anyone starts up saying "Melbourne United is the Melbourne Tigers with their name changed". Melbourne United has dropped references to the Tigers four titles when they made their 'Maiden NBL Finals Series'. United lost many Melbourne Tigers supporters when they changed the name. The name Melbourne Tigers is still well known, and a come back to the NBL is planned.
For the A-League, I have little interest in except for the two local teams in Melbourne Victory and Melbourne City. Expansion of the league should come from minor leagues as big business men have started teams in the A-League and they no longer exist or have changed.
For the NRL, I think they are at the maximum amount of teams they should go to at the moment. Sixteen is the perfect number.