- Banned
- #51
Saw it again last night and had a few questions.
1) If "based" on a true story it would have been good if the guy that survived witnessed the girls being tortured, because in reality how do we know what really happened to them. Even if he didnt in real life the movie would have a touch more real element to it IMO.
2) I have read on the net why no mobile phones, I think this is obvious a) 1999 cost and not everyone had one back then b)coverage issues
3) A bit unrealistic for the murderer to be sitting in the car waiting for the girl?
4) When they were feeling sleepy surely alarm bells should have been going off? How stupid? but then again this is a horror movie!
5) One thing I just never understand is why when given the chance do they not kill the guy that was torturing them when having the chance? Yes I know its a horror movie!
6) the murderer looks like a Pies supporter!
7) the guy that survived lives in Adelaide!
1) If "based" on a true story it would have been good if the guy that survived witnessed the girls being tortured, because in reality how do we know what really happened to them. Even if he didnt in real life the movie would have a touch more real element to it IMO.
2) I have read on the net why no mobile phones, I think this is obvious a) 1999 cost and not everyone had one back then b)coverage issues
3) A bit unrealistic for the murderer to be sitting in the car waiting for the girl?
4) When they were feeling sleepy surely alarm bells should have been going off? How stupid? but then again this is a horror movie!
5) One thing I just never understand is why when given the chance do they not kill the guy that was torturing them when having the chance? Yes I know its a horror movie!
6) the murderer looks like a Pies supporter!
7) the guy that survived lives in Adelaide!




