
Kurve
Moderator
- Dec 27, 2016
- 13,050
- 29,654
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Of interest.
The Disappearance of David Prideaux
The Disappearance of David Prideaux
Squiggle sez: Eagles 66% chance to win -- What's your tip?
Really sorry to hear that happened to your family member hope she is ok now. Unfortunately accidents like that are a common occurrence with the elderly, falling (whether at home or out) and being unable to get up.I had a retired family member go for a walk in a park near her home in suburbia Melbourne. Fell down the side of a hill and hurt herself. Took forever for her to get up as nobody was around. I'm guessing at their age if one or both have a fall in deep bush they're toast.
Then eaten alive by bush animals. Seems plausible if there is a plausible explanation for the fire.
But seems like the cops believe it is foul play.
sounds plausible save for the fact it was said, by those who knew him, that he would never have set a campfire so close to his vehicle ; and further stated, by investigators, that the blaze appeared to have been "fuelled", possibly by the gas cylinders which, along with all other camping items, had been piled within the tent, perhaps to destroy evidence, but an equinox bonfire should not be dismissed, imho.snipped
So there is then the possibility they went for a walk, leaving food cooking thinking they would be back by the time it was ready. An 'incident' occurred whilst they were out, thus the meal burnt causing a fire which caused the camp site to accidentally burnt down. In this scenario the the campsite burning is not connected to them missing, just a consequence of them not returning.
Though i still have no idea what could have happened to them. My thoughts are that as the area has been thoroughly searched (?) they are no longer in that area, as they would have been found - unless they have fallen down a deep hole or cave.
Sorry mate Nobody drew illustrations into the soot, not sure what your seeing but your the only one seeing it..sounds plausible save for the fact it was said, by those who knew him, that he would never have set a campfire so close to his vehicle ; and further stated, by investigators, that the blaze appeared to have been "fuelled", possibly by the gas cylinders which, along with all other camping items, had been piled within the tent, perhaps to destroy evidence, but an equinox bonfire should not be dismissed, imho.
harping back to the sooty illustration which i described as a cliff face, it also suggested a "cavern" to me ... and that fits in with your big hole theory.
i beg to differ, and while we're at it, that's "you're", stretch. YOU are entitled to YOUR own personal opinion, whilst you're not appointed to speak on behalf of everyone else, "mate"Sorry mate Nobody drew illustrations into the soot, not sure what your seeing but your the only one seeing it..
I saw it too, but only after it was pointed out to me.Sorry mate Nobody drew illustrations into the soot, not sure what your seeing but your the only one seeing it..
Fair enough, but do you seriously believe somebody drew into the soot after burning the tent etc?I saw it too, but only after it was pointed out to me.
As you are, stop being so sensitive.. when i said nobody else, I didn’t see anybody else agree you with,i beg to differ, and while we're at it, that's "you're", stretch. YOU are entitled to YOUR own personal opinion, whilst you're not appointed to speak on behalf of everyone else, "mate"
imho
Truth is stranger than fiction. So you have to go by the evidence (and reasoning).Fair enough, but do you seriously believe somebody drew into the soot after burning the tent etc?
Those drawings or whatever aren’t evidence, that’s an opinion.. I think the police think they might be close leaking reports to the media it seems in a hope it gets suspects to talk.. looking more and more like foul playTruth is stranger than fiction. So you have to go by the evidence (and reasoning).
i do tend to scrutinize available crime scene photos, and it shouldn't feel like going out on a limb when pointing out anything i might have noticed - and truthfully - it was the very first thing i saw.As you are, stop being so sensitive.. when i said nobody else, I didn’t see anybody else agree you with,
in a nutshell? yes.Fair enough, but do you seriously believe somebody drew into the soot after burning the tent etc?
But why would they? Has something like that ever happened that wasn't in a fictional horror film?in a nutshell, yes.
whoever's responsible probably felt they'd all the time in the world in such an isolated location.
imho
i understand you think that but to me that is totally unrealistic.. the rouge hunters theory is probably the strongest as police seem to focusing on that missing 4wd they can’t track down..this case was just mentioned on the evening news.
nothing to do with drug crops.
foul play - they've brought in cadaver dogs.
the drone found did NOT belong to russel hill, it WAS however located within the search area, and investigators are hopeful it may still provide a clue to whatever transpired.
in a nutshell? yes.
whoever's responsible likely felt they'd all the time in the world in such an isolated location.
imho
i agree that the rogue hunters theory is a good one, and it's still not out of the equation ... i myself am not a fan of occam's, i feel it's possibly, often mistakenly assessed as an easy way out of investigation.i understand you think that but to me that is totally unrealistic.. the rouge hunters theory is probably the strongest as police seem to focusing on that missing 4wd they can’t track down..
Police are clearly planting stories in the media to hopefully get them talking.. time will tell I guess.
That's it being used incorrectly.i myself am not a fan of occam's, i feel it's possibly, often mistakenly assessed as an easy way out of investigation.
I'm not seeing anything in the images posted here. No illustrations are visible to me, let alone caricatures of the two missing people. If you can see something, good for you, but there's nothing apparent to me and I think you're imagining things. Feel free to take offence, I won't mind. But perhaps don't throw around ableist slurs, because they really are offensive to people who don't deserve to be offended.i speculate the investigator was likely referring to my earlier noted illustration, drawn into the soot on the vehicle's canopy ... look closely ... to my eye, it contains a very basic caricature of each of the missing couple's side facial profiles.
to me this indicates the illustrator MUST have been familiar enough with the couple's facial attributes, hence i disagree that the sooty illustration was unrelated to the crime.
The crime show gave the impression the wife knew something had been going on for atleast the last 20 years.Pretty obvious explanation. His wife finds out he's been having a multi-decade affair. Goes to the Rebels to hire a hit man. They're a little more competent this side of the Nullarbor.
I'd be curious what the police have investigated re mobile phone tower data. I can't imagine there'd be many entry points to the area in question or that many people using those towers.
Looks like a movie poster.![]()
![]()
Four people have gone missing within a 60km radius in the past year. Their fate remains a mystery
It's not unusual for people to get lost in Victoria's remote and rugged High Country — but it is strange for them to remain missing. That's why the past year has left police and locals baffled.www.abc.net.au
imho
It does and when I first saw it I thought it was actually very weird or even creepy.Looks like a movie poster.
Pretty obvious explanation. His wife finds out he's been having a multi-decade affair. Goes to the Rebels to hire a hit man. They're a little more competent this side of the Nullarbor.
I'd be curious what the police have investigated re mobile phone tower data. I can't imagine there'd be many entry points to the area in question or that many people using those towers.