Ian Dargie
Premiership Player
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2011
- Posts
- 4,838
- Reaction score
- 1,512
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Banned
- #2,601
Not at all.Sarcasm is lost on some i guess
I'm just pointing out that your "all roses" line is stupid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Not at all.Sarcasm is lost on some i guess
Not at all.
I'm just pointing out that your "all roses" line is stupid.
No confusion. But in this case, you've ticked both boxes.Don't confuse stupidity with sarcasm.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Insert many players' names in front of that comment and it still remains valid. Schofield has a big upside and we began to see that late in the season when he was being played as a high forward or across the middle. He provides plenty of run and some pace that we sadly lack.He simply isnt that good a player, goes on a few runs occasionaly but is prone to brainfades and goes missing for large chunks of the game.
In this case, you've ticked both boxes.
Yes, thanksfully.Like the ignore box. Thanksfully it exists.
Like the ignore box. Thankfully it exists.
That's a bit difficult to do better as Woosha is a premiership coach, but if you mean in regards to this current group and time then honestly I don't know if Sumich would do better but he showed he could coach at least at WAFL level when he led South Freo to a premiership and I hope he has learnt a few things from Ross Lyon.Do you think PETER SUMICH would do better than JOHN WORSFOLD?
its already made this conversation very confusing for me
Over the last three seasons, Worsfold's winning percentage is still 60+. That's respectable and certainly doesn't demand he be moved on.Clarko's wining percentage is 60% compared to Woosha's 53%
Since losing Cousins and Judd our winning percentage has been 43%, no coach survives a six year period as bad as this, so why should Woosha?
That's a bit difficult to do better as Woosha is a premiership coach, but if you mean in regards to this current group and time then honestly I don't know if Sumich would do better but he showed he could coach at least at WAFL level when he led South Freo to a premiership and I hope he has learnt a few things from Ross Lyon.
Personally I am not as passionate to see Woosha go as others are and would not complain if he got a one year reprieve from the board, but if he goes I would like to see the board at least interview Sumich.
Except there wasn't anything resembling a personal attack. Bizarre.Yeah sorry, some people just don't play nice and resort to personal attacks. I apologies for derailing thread. But now I don't have to put up with him.![]()
Over the last three seasons, Worsfold's winning percentage is still 60+. That's respectable and certainly doesn't demand he be moved on.
His contract was extended at the end of 2010. That's when the call was made about whether his performance in that down cycle was good enough to warrant more time. That call was made then and, I think, given our results 2011-13, the decision was vindicated.
So you don't get to go back and say 'well, we were shit in 2008-10' and use that as a reason to sack him three years down the line.
There is at least an understanding that if an assistant is offered a senior position they are free to go. Possibly even a clause in the contracts.How long does he have on his contract?
Not sure but practically all clubs release assistant coaches from contracts if they are offered a senior job.How long does he have on his contract?
Not sure but practically all clubs release assistant coaches from contracts if they are offered a senior job.
Over the last three seasons, Worsfold's winning percentage is still 60+. That's respectable and certainly doesn't demand he be moved on.
His contract was extended at the end of 2010. That's when the call was made about whether his performance in that down cycle was good enough to warrant more time. That call was made then and, I think, given our results 2011-13, the decision was vindicated.
So you don't get to go back and say 'well, we were shit in 2008-10' and use that as a reason to sack him three years down the line.
He talks of a rebuild and I don't believe we should be rebuilding again after a 3 year rebuild in 08-10. Yes I see a somewhat need to get some better players and build our list but what for? two more above average years and then start another rebuid?
I haven't seen Worsfold mention "rebuilding" - in the sense of bottoming out and soaking up early draft picks. Quite the opposite. I think his pitch is that we can bounce back quickly and play finals next year.He talks of a rebuild and I don't believe we should be rebuilding again after a 3 year rebuild in 08-10. Yes I see a somewhat need to get some better players and build our list but what for? two more above average years and then start another rebuid?
He talks of a rebuild and I don't believe we should be rebuilding again after a 3 year rebuild in 08-10. Yes I see a somewhat need to get some better players and build our list but what for? two more above average years and then start another rebuid?
Things would look less grim if Ebert was on the list still however we made a poor/unlucky choice at the draft table selecting a player who had his heart set on one club.
Do you do anything but wring your hands and lather everything in the shrillest kind of melodrama?He was hoping the old hands would carry the young guys to a flag. It's all for nothing now. We must rebuild.