No it isn't.
But losing 5 games is!!!!!![]()
And what does winning 5 games mean?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
No it isn't.
But losing 5 games is!!!!!![]()
Yeah but to bloody Richmond ffs ? I would prefer to lose to Carlton or Norths over them. How could we let Richmond Football Club flog us @ our home ground ffs ? come on answer me here all ye who are sprouting delusions of grandeur ? I say you are only as good as your last game and 9nthmond @ Subi showed me we are 10th or worse.Maybe he relises that loosing one games isn't the end of life as we know it.
Yeah but to bloody Richmond ffs ? I would prefer to lose to Carlton or Norths over them. How could we let Richmond Football Club flog us @ our home ground ffs ? come on answer me here all ye who are sprouting delusions of grandeur ? I say you are only as good as your last game and 9nthmond @ Subi showed me we are 10th or worse.
I agree totally although, given that I can predict the response, I tend to keep it out of forums. It's a little like sitting several cars back at a traffic light that's turned green and thinking/muttering/shouting "GO ALREADY! USE YOUR BRAIN! DON'T WAIT UNTIL THE CAR IN FRONT HAS ACCELERATED AWAY BEFORE YOU GET IN GEAR AND TAKE YOUR FOOT OFF THE BRAKE!"And I can't stand people who don't even make an effort to use correct grammar.
Surely you were all taught the difference between your and you're
And loose and lose
And to too and two
I'm not sure if the school system is to blame or whether people are just too lazy.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
cognizant
So what? We lost, happens all the time. Doesn't matter to who we lost, or the manner of how we lost, it's done. Not even an infinite amount of rage and whining can change that. So why the hell are people still crying about the coach and the players and what they didn't do. How about we all focus on what the coach and the players are going to do differently this week.
So what? We lost, happens all the time. Doesn't matter to who we lost, or the manner of how we lost, it's done. Not even an infinite amount of rage and whining can change that. So why the hell are people still crying about the coach and the players and what they didn't do. How about we all focus on what the coach and the players are going to do differently this week.
I agree, it's pretty bad. But it really does highlight just how important the classy and dynamic midfielder is to the modern game. People assert that the Brownlow is essentially a medal honouring the best midfielder, but they do change the game. It's still won around stoppages (on-ball and midfield), gaining the ball in dispute (on-ball with contested possessions and key position with contested marks), and elite disposal (essential in half-backs, on-ball and midfield).Because nothing has been changed all year and look at the position we're in. We also won't make the finals, which is disgraceful for a team with the best forward, back and rucks in the game and that most people had us either finishing first or winning the flag.
I can't see it changing significantly enough to suit that game style. Unless we trade out some of our quality forwards for quality midfielders and somehow add multiple other fit, ready made midfielders which I highly doubt.
Look at the difference in midfielders using Sydney and Freos teams from the weekend.
Sydney: O'Keefe, Kennedy, Jack, Hannebery, Jetta, Parker and McVeigh are all quality midfielders. Add to that young Tom Mitchell, Bird, McGlynn, Bolton and Goodes all having runs through the midfield.
Fremantle: Barlow, Fyfe, Mundy, Hill, Crowley, C.Pearce, D.Pearce, Suban, De Boer, Mzungu and even Ballantyne and Walters can run through the middle.
They both also have more depth in the middle that we do. Their midfields also have genuine leg speed to burst forward and take advantage of the open spaces that are opened up because they push so hard back.
It would require a massive turnover.
After 2010 the Management trusted John on his word that he had the right players to go forward, now after 3 years its clear he was wrong and although we have a pretty decent list the lack of Midfield quality meant that John was wrong and there would be no way he could present that to the Board this time round. If he were to negotiate another 3 year deal what would it be based on ? another rebuild ? I think not and John knows his time is done and the next chapter of his life is close.
Heard today that Woosha's marriage has gone sour. Could explain the lack of enthusiasm as he's distracted elsewhere.![]()
That is terrible news if true but talk of that shouldn't be spoken about on these boards as its pretty personal.
Apologies - my post can be deleted if necessary.That is terrible news if true but talk of that shouldn't be spoken about on these boards as its pretty personal.
You never see his missus involved in anything even from his playing days, I wouldn't be surprised if this is just BS.Heard today that Woosha's marriage has gone sour. Could explain the lack of enthusiasm as he's distracted elsewhere.![]()
Not a lot of substance to be found in that article.
Well if history is anything to go by speculation on the future of a coach at a club can affect on field performance.
Doesn't poor on field performance usually highten speculation Re the future of a coach?