Werewolf Work it out Werewolf

[Shueygod]

Also I haven’t played with the bloke but is he the type to not understand what’s going on?

 

[King Tenz]

ClarkeM starts getting heat on him as Headless targeted him twice and got unsuccessful meaning the most likely scenario is Headless is Arsonist and Clarke a night immune role (alternates Headless lying/Arsonist getting blocked back to back) given we know that myself and JHF are likely the only two roles capable of doing so and JHF wasted one on P4L last night it makes the arsonist getting blocked twice pretty unlikely.

This is confusing me.

Why wouldn’t the logical thing here be is that Headless is just a plain old villager?

 

[Pie 4 Life]

Was JHF suspected to be the arsonist though? Pretty sure his main motivation was to “expose” me.

Clarkey was the only one with a real ulterior motive.

He was just saying he couldn't be the arsonist in his post because he had a successful and then unsuccessful action. But without realising it naming porps put him to the top of the list as roleblocker given she missed a kill N1.

 

[King Tenz]

He was just saying he couldn't be the arsonist in his post because he had a successful and then unsuccessful action. But without realising it naming porps put him to the top of the list as roleblocker given she missed a kill N1.

I’ll take that.

JHF please Cadsky

 

[Gralin]

This is an absolute layup of a vote and village is fumbling.

 

[Nothing]

I forgot this started last night. My action was unsuccessful but I didn't even list any names for anything so.... I could be evil, I could be good, who knows in this neighbourhood.

Porps missed because there was no action

 

[ClarkeM]

Also I haven’t played with the bloke but is he the type to not understand what’s going on?

Yes, 100% yes constantly, endlessly, forever.

 

[Nothing]

He was just saying he couldn't be the arsonist in his post because he had a successful and then unsuccessful action. But without realising it naming porps put him to the top of the list as roleblocker given she missed a kill N1.

Note anove from porps

 

[Shueygod]

This is confusing me.

Why wouldn’t the logical thing here be is that Headless is just a plain old villager?

Because one of the people with multi unsuccessfuls is arsonist without realising, headless is the only person to claim two unsuccessfuls on the same person.

Making the most likely scenario him being arsonist Clarke NI.

He was just saying he couldn't be the arsonist in his post because he had a successful and then unsuccessful action. But without realising it naming porps put him to the top of the list as roleblocker given she missed a kill N1.

shueygod for being arsonist

Cadsky

Pie 4 Life

Pay attention. I knew yesterday I was one of a few roles but through last nights events now am certain to be the Doc. What I must confess is on night 1 i targeted Porps and was in fact succesful but used half truth to be left alone throgh an early claim of which i knew others would try.

I targeted pie last night but was unsucessful and I would like to know why? Are you who you say you are???

This was his first post on the matter, I truly believe he legitimately thought he caught me in a lie as he didn’t realise RB would provide the same results.

 

[JHF1870]

Was JHF suspected to be the arsonist though? Pretty sure his main motivation was to “expose” me.

Clarkey was the only one with a real ulterior motive.

If Im the doc, Arsonist points to you given info you released.

Theres only circumstantial evidence for me being roleblockrr. Its possible but in any event. Village is in trouble if two killing neutral roles survive. Essentially 4 village roles eviscerated.

No time to start being risk averse. By tomorrow those neutrals will be firmly working with evil, and no Vig.

 

[Shueygod]

If Im the doc, Arsonist points to you given info you released.

Theres only circumstantial evidence for me being roleblockrr. Its possible but in any event. Village is in trouble if two killing neutral roles survive. Essentially 4 village roles eviscerated.

No time to start being risk averse. By tomorrow those neutrals will be firmly working with evil, and no Vig.

JHF it is literally impossible for me to be arsonist, P4L observed me targeting some one yesterday.

3KZ would be dead right now.

 

[ClarkeM]

I reckon Shuey is pretty sus

 

[Pie 4 Life]

I reckon Shuey is pretty sus

He can't be the arsonist, and if you're telling the truth, can't be the roleblocker as he targeted you N1 so you would not have got a successful result. Given I know for a fact he targeted EJW N2 and well EJW is still with us, it rules out a whole heap of evil results.

If you're telling the truth, they have to be the doc.

 

[Pie 4 Life]

He can't be the arsonist, and if you're telling the truth, can't be the roleblocker as he targeted you N1 so you would not have got a successful result. Given I know for a fact he targeted EJW N2 and well EJW is still with us, it rules out a whole heap of evil results.

If you're telling the truth, they have to be the doc.

By EJW I mean 3KZ, it's been a long day and mixing with SFA stuff and being tired. You get it. Acronyms are hard etc.

 

[ClarkeM]

He can't be the arsonist, and if you're telling the truth, can't be the roleblocker as he targeted you N1 so you would not have got a successful result. Given I know for a fact he targeted EJW N2 and well EJW is still with us, it rules out a whole heap of evil results.

If you're telling the truth, they have to be the doc.

Nah I just think he’s pretty sus.

 

[Shueygod]

He can't be the arsonist, and if you're telling the truth, can't be the roleblocker as he targeted you N1 so you would not have got a successful result. Given I know for a fact he targeted EJW N2 and well EJW is still with us, it rules out a whole heap of evil results.

If you're telling the truth, they have to be the doc.

I could be a seer realistically.

 

[ClarkeM]

And I’m absolutely telling the truth, both actions I received a successful result, both mornings.

Do we know what’s with the listing of the second person’s name?

 

[Pie 4 Life]

I could be a seer realistically.

if you were a seer you would be given the player you targeted's role. Unless you've been given that, you're not a seer.

 

[Pie 4 Life]

And I’m absolutely telling the truth, both actions I received a successful result, both mornings.

Do we know what’s with the listing of the second person’s name?

Mostly for Bus Driver purposes (who was modkilled early D1 lol). Where it involves two people. But also for heads if everyone else in the faction is dead (then they would take care of the killing as well as seering).

 

[Shueygod]

if you were a seer you would be given the player you targeted's role. Unless you've been given that, you're not a seer.

I meant from an outside perspective, I know I’m not a seer. Just being impartial.

 

[King Tenz]

Yes, 100% yes constantly, endlessly, forever.

Don’t worry I think most of us don’t have a clue.

 

[King Tenz]

Because one of the people with multi unsuccessfuls is arsonist without realising, headless is the only person to claim two unsuccessfuls on the same person.

Making the most likely scenario him being arsonist Clarke NI.

Think like 7 of us have had multiple unsuccessful results though.

 

[ClarkeM]

I could be a seer realistically.

Well are you?

 

[ClarkeM]

Don’t worry I think most of us don’t have a clue.

I’ve gathered that! I love this game

 

[Shueygod]

Think like 7 of us have had multiple unsuccessful results though.

But no one else targeted the same person twice.

Two scenarios with this:

Arsonist missed twice from the 3 players who claim to have the ability to block/heal I’ve used one on ClarkeM, JHF wasted one on P4L. Meaning at most there was 3 block/heal actions with the likely scenario being 2.

The second is simply Headless being arsonist, Clarke NI.

There’s 5 possible roles I could be from an outside perspective, JHF claimed with zero reason to do so.

Clarke is the most likely to be lying from that perspective.