Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
Moderator
- May 24, 2006
- 77,325
- 151,943
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Redbacks, Sturt, Liverpool, Arizona
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #201
Goal Japan!!!
2-1 up
2-1 up
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Japan tops the group not without quite some controversy as the VAR allowed their second goal that looked clearly to have crossed the line. If it was a draw Spain and Germany progress. I'm not unhappy that another team from Asia is through and a European powerhouse is it out, but VAR is supposed there to get things right.
If he puts in a similar type game V Argentina, there is no doubt he won't be playing in the English Championship for very much longerHow good has Harry Soutter been over the tournament so far especially coming back from a knee reco.
Japan tops the group not without quite some controversy as the VAR allowed their second goal that looked clearly to have crossed the line. If it was a draw Spain and Germany progress. I'm not unhappy that another team from Asia is through and a European powerhouse is it out, but VAR is supposed there to get things right.
We can only dream about that result.That doesn't look completely out to me
They have a higher overhead shot directly along the line that is a better angle
For the VAR, Fernando Guerrero of Mexico, to overturn the decision of the assistant, he has to have definitive evidence that part of the ball is on the line. Importantly, this isn't just about the ball touching the ground. The curvature overhanging the line also counts, even if a very small part of the ball is doing so. (FIFA's new tracking technology cannot be used to determine the ball being in or out of play.)
A photograph from a camera level with the goal-line also appears to prove a small amount of the ball was overhanging the line. That would give the VAR the proof he needs to overturn the on-field decision and award a goal. But this image appeared on the Associated Press' picture service over an hour after the game. The evidence was not provided by FIFA, and that's one of the inherent problems of VAR -- communication with the fans.
Until this point we'd not seen any clear proof that the ball was touching the line when Mitoma cut it back to Tanaka -- even though it actually had on the goal-line camera; we just didn't know.
Here's a good analysis / explanation of the VAR decision in the Japan-Spain game:
Why Japan's winning goal vs. Spain was awarded by the VAR
We're analysing every VAR decision at the 2022 World Cup. The VAR crucially awarded Japan's winning goal against Spain, with the ball in play.www.espn.com.au
Key quotes:
Look I feel a lot more comfortable knowing that the Mexican VAR that over ruled the original decision had his prescription filled at Bondi Junction Spec Savers 24 hours beforehand.
Well at least I have got to the bottom of why my Danes were knocked were knocked out kicking me out of the BF sweep in the process their secret note @ 72mins finds it's way into enemy hands.
Exhibit: A)
Well at least I have got to the bottom of why my Danes were knocked out kicking me out of the BF sweep in the process their secret note @ 72mins finds it's way into enemy hands.
Exhibit: A)
It was apparently. One of the Aus coaching staff is a coach in the Danish league and could read it.Haha, if the Danes were smart, they would have written the note in Danish!