World Test Championship 2019-2021

iluvparis

Premium Platinum
Apr 1, 2005
27,996
20,019
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Calgary Flames, Man Utd
No you can't grade it based on the quality of opposition as it's irrelevant like you said.

The championship should run until each side has played the same amount of matches, alternatively if sides are only playing 7 or 8 tests a year, they need to up their output if they wish to compete for the championship.
No one is going to play the Bangers in a 5 test series to make up for The Ashes though
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

omarlittle1

Club Legend
Aug 1, 2010
1,513
1,005
Sydney
AFL Club
West Coast
How on earth are we rated 5th in Test rankings by the ICC and England are 4th?! I get that we lost in SA in 2018 and to India at home, but England lost to WI and now again to us at home. It's pretty confusing.
 

omarlittle1

Club Legend
Aug 1, 2010
1,513
1,005
Sydney
AFL Club
West Coast
How on earth are we rated 5th in Test rankings by the ICC and England are 4th?! I get that we lost in SA in 2018 and to India at home, but England lost to WI and now again to us at home. It's pretty confusing.
 

Park cricketer

Club Legend
Nov 29, 2018
1,095
1,529
AFL Club
Adelaide
How on earth are we rated 5th in Test rankings by the ICC and England are 4th?! I get that we lost in SA in 2018 and to India at home, but England lost to WI and now again to us at home. It's pretty confusing.
The last 3 years performances are taken into consideration with 50% weightage given to the first two years and 100% weightage for the recent 12 months I think. In between, Australia also lost to Pakistan in the UAE and drew with Bangladesh away. The algorithm is such that you lose more points for losing/failing to win against a weaker team and so it would probably have affected Australia's ranking points.

In any case, with the introduction of the World test championship, the ICC team rankings have become moot and practically have no relevance other than to know about a team's recent form.
 

omarlittle1

Club Legend
Aug 1, 2010
1,513
1,005
Sydney
AFL Club
West Coast
The last 3 years performances are taken into consideration with 50% weightage given to the first two years and 100% weightage for the recent 12 months I think. In between, Australia also lost to Pakistan in the UAE and drew with Bangladesh away. The algorithm is such that you lose more points for losing/failing to win against a weaker team and so it would probably have affected Australia's ranking points.

In any case, with the introduction of the World test championship, the ICC team rankings have become moot and practically have no relevance other than to know about a team's recent form.
Very informative. Cheers mate!
 

Crankyhawk

Brownlow Medallist
Sep 21, 2007
13,829
8,951
Melbourne
AFL Club
Hawthorn
https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/27295281/new-world-test-championship-playing-conditions


A quirk of this is that teams playing longer series are at more risk.
A win in a longer series is worth less points (the same number of points are available across a series but laid out on a match by match basis).

A team that wins a match in a three match series, receives 40 points but loses two per lost over.
In a five match series, those two deducted from 24 points. Along with there 40% more chances to offend in the longer series.
It rewards short series by reducing risk.
Doesn’t look like any penalty was applied for 4th test (s**t rates both ways)
 

Dr Awkward

Premiership Player
Mar 23, 2009
4,377
1,902
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
San Antonio Spurs
I like the test championship, it is a necessary idea that hopefully boosts test cricket and they will figure out the rules a bit better afte rthe first iteration.

The main problem I see is only playing one test for the final. Kind of goes against what test cricket is all about, should be best of three series and should be played in the nation that finished top of the table.

Playing one test for a final is a bit mickey mouse. If it's a flat deck and you lose the toss you'd be stiff
 

melanChronic

Club Legend
Apr 1, 2009
2,475
3,789
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
I like the test championship, it is a necessary idea that hopefully boosts test cricket and they will figure out the rules a bit better afte rthe first iteration.

The main problem I see is only playing one test for the final. Kind of goes against what test cricket is all about, should be best of three series and should be played in the nation that finished top of the table.

Playing one test for a final is a bit mickey mouse. If it's a flat deck and you lose the toss you'd be stiff
In this vein they should also make each WTC series have a minimum of 3 tests. Makes the points system more meaningful and stops the bigger nations shortchanging the smaller nations in terms of test match experience.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

iluvparis

Premium Platinum
Apr 1, 2005
27,996
20,019
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Calgary Flames, Man Utd
Last year in Test cricket there legitimately would have been the least amount of flat decks in about 50 years. 2018 was the lowest average runs per dismissal since 1957.
Yes and as I said - teams that won the toss in the last 2 years have gone 50-26 (11 draws)

Winning the toss is the primary factor behind winning most tests these days, regardless of how good the pitch is.
 

Dr Awkward

Premiership Player
Mar 23, 2009
4,377
1,902
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
San Antonio Spurs
Yes and as I said - teams that won the toss in the last 2 years have gone 50-26 (11 draws)

Winning the toss is the primary factor behind winning most tests these days, regardless of how good the pitch is.
Yeah and this is what makes Paine's comments after the 5th test baffling. "We don't see the toss as that important anyway".

The toss is crucial, you gotta make it count when you win it.
 

cricketnut14

Team Captain
Jan 13, 2015
354
173
AFL Club
Sydney
I like the test championship, it is a necessary idea that hopefully boosts test cricket and they will figure out the rules a bit better afte rthe first iteration.

The main problem I see is only playing one test for the final. Kind of goes against what test cricket is all about, should be best of three series and should be played in the nation that finished top of the table.

Playing one test for a final is a bit mickey mouse. If it's a flat deck and you lose the toss you'd be stiff
I don't mind the idea and concept, although the points system and allocated test matches don't really give a exact indication where the teams are at. If everyone played everyone evenly (and I know that will never happen), it would be fairer.

It'd almost be better off having Aust, Eng, Ind, SA in a test championship and all other series as lead ups, if the others are going to only get 2 and 3 test series.

It's silly that Zim, Ire, Afg have test status but aren't included.
 

Richard Pryor

Norm Smith Medallist
Feb 6, 2013
8,671
11,332
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Yeah and this is what makes Paine's comments after the 5th test baffling. "We don't see the toss as that important anyway".

The toss is crucial, you gotta make it count when you win it.
Like with his comments on his DRS troubles, I think Paine uses "we" instead of "I" when he's saying something he doesn't fully stand behind.
 

iluvparis

Premium Platinum
Apr 1, 2005
27,996
20,019
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Calgary Flames, Man Utd
Yeah and this is what makes Paine's comments after the 5th test baffling. "We don't see the toss as that important anyway".

The toss is crucial, you gotta make it count when you win it.
It is so stupid and is sadly what you come to expect in this fake news era. Any reasonable report should have immediately responded with any number of basic stats to show that statement is horrendously incorrect.
 

Top Bottom