Covid-19 Wuhan Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Part 4 - Ivermectin doesn't work either.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Continued in Part 5:



 
Aug 2, 2012
34,820
56,387
AFL Club
Geelong
My favourite part is when they - completely lacking any form of self reflection - declare everyone else is selfish for not wanting to allow them to do whatever they want, whenever they want, however they want, because MuH fReEdUmS!
It always boils down to these 2 propositions
1 We will just have to live with it, but
2 Some of you will have to die
 
228279543_167414892149227_7503569912578273660_n.jpg

 
Last edited:
Sep 17, 2019
21,988
34,991
AFL Club
Richmond
No I learned to speak like a politician in the business world and not make absolute statements without 110% certainty. I'm confident in the fact but don't want to mislead with my words considering I'm not an expert.

Something many here would do well to adopt.

Craig Kelly endorses Ivermectin after developing itchy scalp

1628207317466.png
 
Jan 13, 2007
14,553
17,676
Melbourne
AFL Club
Sydney
Your Sky puppet show has been wrong about almost everything.

One day you will realise this.
Which of these are “conspiracy theories”?

“conspiracy theories on Covid-19 with particular emphasis on it being developed in a Chinese lab; the “stolen” US election; Hunter Biden’s email and laptop scandal and Joe Biden’s mental capacity.”

Aside, perhaps, only perhaps, from the stolen election.
 
Apr 23, 2016
30,510
42,674
AFL Club
Essendon
I think back in primary school we used to say “I know you are but what am I?”

So you agree that there's no rule that viruses have to mutate to be less deadly. You agree that the 1918 Pandemic second wave was more deadly than the first, due to a more deadly mutation.

Sounds a lot like you agreeing, but seemingly wanting to argue because reasons?
 
Jan 13, 2007
14,553
17,676
Melbourne
AFL Club
Sydney
So you agree that there's no rule that viruses have to mutate to be less deadly. You agree that the 1918 Pandemic second wave was more deadly than the first, due to a more deadly mutation.

Sounds a lot like you agreeing, but seemingly wanting to argue because reasons?
You do a lot of verballing. I don’t think you are very honest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back