And it's unfortunate but not everyone (such as Gough) is physically (or intellectually) suited to live in a capitalistic society.
Like I said, you agree with me without even realizing it.
Then I'd imagine herculez09 is not an extremist lefty.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And it's unfortunate but not everyone (such as Gough) is physically (or intellectually) suited to live in a capitalistic society.
Like I said, you agree with me without even realizing it.
For me to admit that I'm a bigot for not letting you play AFL.I'm sorry, what is the point of this thread?
It's hilarious how people think they actually subscribe to the leftist narrative, but when challenged (e.g. with an analogy based on the AFL), they actually confess to leaning towards meritocracy. Interesting!
When are you leftists going to admit that your crusade isn't really about defending the "oppressed" and "victims", but more about personal interest?
Let's face it. You don't give a **** about the oppressed. Your mission is to improve your own lot in life out of selfishness because you are a loser.
As a further analogy using the AFL. Imagine, if I really, really, really wanted to play in the AFL but I was too short and fat to do so. Instead of saying "It sucks that I was born short and fat, but I'll just blame those with good football genes for having 'privilege' and oppressing all of us who didn't have Gary Ablett (senior) as their dad. Maybe if we could create a huge, massive movement out of this discontent, losers like me who were not cut out to play AFL football might actually be able to play AFL football."
So ******* laughable.
Nope. 100% accurate reflection of the left. Too bad, loser.
Anyone got a spare Bex they can lend this guy?Why should your friends under 5'11" be denied the opportunity to play AFL? WHY?! IT'S SO UNFAIR!!!!!
For example, if I decided to marry my first cousin which leads to genetic deformities, it's not my fault that my offspring is genetically deformed. It's the fault of people who do not marry their first cousins that their children have "privileges" accorded to offspring of parents who do not marry their first cousins.
Disclaimer: Any connection with any person, real or fictitious, who has married their first cousin is purely coincidental.
Would only work if you put it on his forehead.Anyone got a spare Bex they can lend this guy?
When are you leftists going to admit that your crusade isn't really about defending the "oppressed" and "victims", but more about personal interest?
Let's face it. You don't give a **** about the oppressed. Your mission is to improve your own lot in life out of selfishness because you are a loser
As a further analogy using the AFL. Imagine, if I really, really, really wanted to play in the AFL but I was too short and fat to do so. Instead of saying "It sucks that I was born short and fat, but I'll just blame those with good football genes for having 'privilege' and oppressing all of us who didn't have Gary Ablett (senior) as their dad. Maybe if we could create a huge, massive movement out of this discontent, losers like me who were not cut out to play AFL football might actually be able to play AFL football."
So ******* laughable.
This is a load of crap too. Show me a lefty who wants people who just aren't good enough to play top-grade sports at the highest level. Show me one single instance.
You don't need to show single instances. It's institutional. If there were a level playing field between men and womens playing top-grade sports at the highest level there would not be a single instance of a female making a substantial living from playing sport.
Which AFL team would Daisy Pearce break into? Serena Williams would not be top 300 in the world. The Matildas would get smashed be a decent u17s boys team.
You don't need to show single instances. It's institutional. If there were a level playing field between men and womens playing top-grade sports at the highest level there would not be a single instance of a female making a substantial living from playing sport.
Which AFL team would Daisy Pearce break into? Serena Williams would not be top 300 in the world. The Matildas would get smashed be a decent u17s boys team.
Wait. What. You mean to tell me that 'the left' is arguing that all team sports should be mixed? REALLY? I have legitimately never read about this.
These things don't actually legitimately need to exist for some people to justify to continue their detachment from reality whereby "the left" is responsible for all ill's in society.Wait. What. You mean to tell me that 'the left' is arguing that all team sports should be mixed? REALLY? I have legitimately never read about this.
Wait. What. You mean to tell me that 'the left' is arguing that all team sports should be mixed? REALLY? I have legitimately never read about this.
To make anyone unfortunate enough to read it dumber.I'm sorry, what is the point of this thread?
I didn't say that.
There's an institutional policy that allows people with lesser abilities to play top-grade sports at the highest level - because they are female. If we had mixed teams and treated males and females equally there would be no females at the highest level of sport.
There's people pushing for equal pay for female sports stars and arguments about sex change athletes. But strangely no push for mixed teams which would resolve those arguments.
I didn't say that.
There's an institutional policy that allows people with lesser abilities to play top-grade sports at the highest level - because they are female. If we had mixed teams and treated males and females equally there would be no females at the highest level of sport.
There's people pushing for equal pay for female sports stars and arguments about sex change athletes. But strangely no push for mixed teams which would resolve those arguments.
Exhibit A of why many people who get to vote aren't sane enough to deserve the rightThe AFL is largely merit based. If you’re out of form or just not up to scratch, you don’t get a game. Period.
The left wants to put people in power who may not necessarily be qualified but apparently deserve to be purely because of their skin color to satisfy the “diversity” criteria.
So if you’re left leaning, you really should stop following AFL.
In actuality, many left-leaning dickheads in this board don’t actually follow football and only post ******** on SRP. I don’t even know why they’re here seeing as this is supposed to be a website about footy.
But what if those first-cousined genetically deformed offspring want to play AFL football? Don't you think it's unfair that they not be given the opportunity to do so? Shouldn't everyone be given the opportunity to play AFL football?
You just said that anyone under 5'11" shouldn't be allowed to play AFL football, which I find offensive. You're quite the bigot.
And by the way, are you sure it doesn't "impact" you? What if your son or daughter decided to marry an offspring of a first-cousin marriage (who is more than likely going to have a personality disorder)? Would you be happy for your son or daughter to be in an abusive relationship?
Disclaimer: Again, any real-life connection with a culture that actually engages in the practice of marrying their first cousins is coincidental. I do NOT know of ANY WHATSOVER! If you have know of a culture that does so, that is on YOU!
The AFL is largely merit based. If you’re out of form or just not up to scratch, you don’t get a game. Period.
The left wants to put people in power who may not necessarily be qualified but apparently deserve to be purely because of their skin color to satisfy the “diversity” criteria.
So if you’re left leaning, you really should stop following AFL.
In actuality, many left-leaning dickheads in this board don’t actually follow football and only post bulls**t on SRP. I don’t even know why they’re here seeing as this is supposed to be a website about footy.
I'm pretty sure that being unqualified has never been an impediment to being in power.The AFL is largely merit based. If you’re out of form or just not up to scratch, you don’t get a game. Period.
The left wants to put people in power who may not necessarily be qualified but apparently deserve to be purely because of their skin color to satisfy the “diversity” criteria.
So if you’re left leaning, you really should stop following AFL.
In actuality, many left-leaning dickheads in this board don’t actually follow football and only post bulls**t on SRP. I don’t even know why they’re here seeing as this is supposed to be a website about footy.
Withering sarcasm.And of course the private and corporate sectors are pure and pristine. Their perfect meritocracy produce elite forms of efficiency, honesty and integrity.
See Australian Banking Sector
Withering sarcasm.
On the topic, how many years now has it been since executive renumeration officially decoupled from performance?
The AFL is largely merit based. If you’re out of form or just not up to scratch, you don’t get a game. Period.
The left wants to put people in power who may not necessarily be qualified but apparently deserve to be purely because of their skin color to satisfy the “diversity” criteria.
So if you’re left leaning, you really should stop following AFL.
In actuality, many left-leaning dickheads in this board don’t actually follow football and only post bullshit on SRP. I don’t even know why they’re here seeing as this is supposed to be a website about footy.
The AFL is socialist with its equalisation policies and salary cap.
Without these, West Coast, Richmond, Collingwood would dominate every year, not just 2018.
Left wingers by the OP logic should hate major European football leagues instead or modern day formula one
Yes, but people need to understand why a country like Australia does this.In Western society you don't need to even be good enough. You can be way below average
Quotas, political positioning, virtue signalling, can all give a leg up to minorities