Remove this Banner Ad

Young KPP's

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bentleigh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

i disagree i have never yet seen a well rounded footy team who are defensively sound not win a premiership. hawthorn imo are in front of us. the only two young kpp players i have any faith in are riedwoldt and hughes.

Hawthorn aren't in front of us, most of their young draftees haven't played a senior game. Our crop is further developed.
 
You can't have it both ways. Can't use early picks to build a midfield-led team and still have early picks for KP players.

Have to make a choice.

Go tall. Go quick. Go for a blend.

We have made our decision and I am comfortable with it. We are building a team that can run and will dominate the running / transition game than will be king for the next 10 years.

Some of the teams that have gone for a blend will be neither fish nor foul.

Hawthorn might yet be proven right - and us wrong. But for now they will be like the Saints. Great KP at either end and a 4 man midfield to get the ball to them.

I'd back our 15 man midfield to leave Franklin, Thorp and co fetching their knitting so they have something to do in the second half as the ball never comes near them.

what happened to the bulldogs against the eagles this year, they got smashed

glass, hunter, cox, hansen, lynch etc very good spine to compliment the best midfield of all time

its one thing to have a run and carry style of game and its another to be unaccountable for your opponent and watching the ball move in circles like most of our games were this year

class kpp will always prevail
 
Sydney won a premiership with one KP player in Barry Hall and a mobile ruckman in Goodes. Leo Barry at 184cm is hardly a towering presence, and O'Keefe, Bolton, O'Loughlin, Kennelly are exactly the types we have been recruiting.

Port Adelaide won in 2004 with Wakelin, Bishop and Chad Cornes in the key defense spots. Hardly a super-star and Cornes is the model for Joel Bowden as a CHB.

Essendon won with Dean Wallis at CHB. He was no better than Ray Hall.

Adelaide won their back-to-back premierships with Darren Jarman at FF. Those premiership teams boasted such KP 'star's as Peter Caven, David Pittman, Shane Ellen, Matt Robran.

The Roos won with Ian Fairley, Mick Martyn, Mark 'the Fridge' Roberts, Darren Crocker, Matt Capuano, Craig Scholl providing the support to Archer, Carey and McKernan.

You need a couple of decent big blokes but premiership teams are littered with C-grade big blokes doing a job.

Not in the year 2000, Wallis was more than handy.In his early days his was a average though.
 
what happened to the bulldogs against the eagles this year, they got smashed

glass, hunter, cox, hansen, lynch etc very good spine to compliment the best midfield of all time

its one thing to have a run and carry style of game and its another to be unaccountable for your opponent and watching the ball move in circles like most of our games were this year

class kpp will always prevail

I see your point, but in that game they just weren't good enough in the midfield. It's West Coast's midfield that makes them great. Of the KPP list you've put up there, only Cox is an A grader. Glass is good, but he's a role player. Hunter is very handy but isn't any better than someone like Joel Bowden.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

glass is the AA full back and hunter would be getting massive money if he wanted to come to melbourne, and kpp is the eagles weakest point so thats what im saying
 
what happened to the bulldogs against the eagles this year, they got smashed

Three words, Judd, Kerr, Cousins.

glass, hunter, cox, hansen, lynch etc very good spine to compliment the best midfield of all time

its one thing to have a run and carry style of game and its another to be unaccountable for your opponent and watching the ball move in circles like most of our games were this year

class kpp will always prevail

Okay KPP, but not great. Sydney had the better KPP in this year's grand final yet lost in the middle. Football now is ruled by the middle.
 
Carlton, Essendon, Hawthorn and a couple other teams have better KP prospects as we do!


i dispute that, none of them have demonstrated that on the field and I mean none...Please list the performance to date of the Roughheads..Dowlers, Kennedys and Ryder.and then compare that against our boys...think you'll find there's precious little to support to make such a ridiculous unqualified remark
 
Three words, Judd, Kerr, Cousins.



Okay KPP, but not great. Sydney had the better KPP in this year's grand final yet lost in the middle. Football now is ruled by the middle.

Apart from the first quarter, I thought Sydney controlled the midfield, they were alot more effective.
 
Apart from the first quarter, I thought Sydney controlled the midfield, they were alot more effective.

Even if this was the case (which it wasn't); Goodes, Kirk, O'Keefe, Jude Bolton, Kennelly, Buchanan is a pretty handy midfeild group.
 
hansen and lynch won it for the eagles, hall lost it for sydney

nah but kpp dont matter :rolleyes:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

How bout Judd and Embleys combined 3 goals and 60 odd touches?

i think kerr played better than both of them but how about hansen's raping of lrt and lynch bombing crucial goals from ouside 50

glass and hunter did the business and cox was brillant

that is the difference between quality and travis gaspar
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

i think kerr played better than both of them

Cousins comes 4th then.

When Cousins is your 4th best midfeilder you know you have a decent midfield.

Midfields win games these days. They win grand finals.

but how about hansen's raping of lrt and lynch bombing crucial goals from ouside 50

LTR is rubbish. Deadset unco. Poor mans Ray Hall.

Lynch is pretty average also, just a big unit.

Hughes will be Hansen-like.

glass and hunter did the business and cox was brillant

Hall had a rare bad game which helped the defensive KPP's.

Cox is a superstar - again proves midfeilds important.

that is the difference between quality and travis gaspar

T Gaspar -> poor
WCE KPP -> middle of the road.

Their outstanding midfield has got them in the GF the last 2 years.
 
yeh it got them into the gf but their kpp were the difference between losing and winning

no doubt they have the best midfield in the league but even last year when they needed some grabs from gardiner and gaspar it didnt happen despite all the ball that was coming to them

eagles havent lost a game with hansen in the team all year so it just shows even the best midfield need a lead up target

agree lynch is a dud but id take 3 goals in a gf anyday of the week

look at adelaide and how they choked, you dont win grand finals with ian perrie as your target man
 
yeh it got them into the gf but their kpp were the difference between losing and winning

no doubt they have the best midfield in the league but even last year when they needed some grabs from gardiner and gaspar it didnt happen despite all the ball that was coming to them

eagles havent lost a game with hansen in the team all year so it just shows even the best midfield need a lead up target

agree lynch is a dud but id take 3 goals in a gf anyday of the week

look at adelaide and how they choked, you dont win grand finals with ian perrie as your target man

By the same token WCE KPP lost them the GF the year before then? And the stronger Sydney KPP won it for them? :confused: When games, more so GF's are won by under a goal I don't think you can read quite as much into it as you are. Certainly not KPP wins grand finals.

The gardiner and gaspar WCE side the year before only just lost. If Leo Barry didn't take marks of the century then we would be discussing how gardiner @ CHF and gaspar @ CHB wins you grand finals. It's fact it gets you withing a couple points.

Cleave Hughes will turn into our Hansen. A forward flanker type who leads hard into the midfeild instead of taking contested CHF marks.
 
forget margins its the result that counts

judd won the norm smith ffs and even that couldnt get them over the line so yes i think hansen and lynch won them the grand final

im not saying we dont have the kp cattle but dont talk about this run and carry sexy football which is rubbish in grand finals and not built for success
 
forget margins its the result that counts

Rubbish.

Both GF's could have gone either way.

judd won the norm smith ffs and even that couldnt get them over the line so yes i think hansen and lynch won them the grand final

What does the Norm Smith have to do with anything? :confused:

Hansen and Lynch didn't win them the grand final. It was a combined effort of course from the side; but the major factor was the outstanding midfeild unit which made up for a run of the mill spine.

im not saying we dont have the kp cattle but dont talk about this run and carry sexy football which is rubbish in grand finals and not built for success

Run and carry with good skills and super-athletics, is the way of the future.

Modern football. The trend will only continue to grow.
 
both results werent flukes, the best team won on both occasions

chris judd was the best on ground in a midfield role and it couldnt win them the grand final, thats my point

lol run of the mill spine, 2 AA players in cox and glass with a player like hunter who is hot property and a major cog like hansen really ordinary :rolleyes:

who said skills and run wasnt important? you can have all of that but you dont need to be 70kgs and have a 2.8 for 20m next to your name

get a bloody clue mate
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom