Opinion Zak Jones hit on Cloke

Remove this Banner Ad

Was it a 50 because he didn't make a play on the ball? If he shepherded him the same way would it have been a 50 or even a turnover?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Was it a 50 because he didn't make a play on the ball? If he shepherded him the same way would it have been a 50 or even a turnover?
I think it was for the lateness of the bump. They deemed Cloke had marked the ball already before Zak "chose" (i.e. already while in mid air) to bump. Collected him after taking the mark and the 50 was paid. Fair enough too I say. If it was the other way around I'd want a 50m penalty.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top