Thanks. I expect most people disagree with my views, but that's simply the way I think of it.PerthCrow said:As I said I could see the initial point and this expands on it fairly
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks. I expect most people disagree with my views, but that's simply the way I think of it.PerthCrow said:As I said I could see the initial point and this expands on it fairly
NMWBloods said:I'm just simply commenting on the specific words about human life. I think it is too often regarded as sacrosanct no matter what. Which is also quite ironic considering how often people are killed around the world, and have always been, and how easily people also takes the lives of other living beings. I don't think empathy and compassion are always warranted - certainly these people would not have it.
Just on this would it be better for the US to have Osama alive and tried before a court so that his crimes can be shown to the world?Richo83 said:Osama Bin Laden. The fact that he still lives is a huge mark against the war on terror.
So your saying Iraqis dont care about Saddam enough to do this?Todman said:There was no need for Zarqawi to be taken alive.
Resting your knees on top of his chest would be enough to suffercate him.
A live Zarqawi would encourage followers to take hostages and demand a exchange, Zarqawi would be nursed back to health by the system that he tried to destroy.
Headline
Al Qaida take schoolchildren hostage.
Will shoot ten every hour until Zarqawi is released!!
NMWBloods said:Fukc off dcikhead.
I'm commenting specifically on the words, not who said them.
.
NMWBloods said:Typical that you're the only one to read it that way because you're petty and always looking to start a fight and score points. Just tragic.
Suuure, you know what I was thinking more than I did because you are so amazingly brilliant. There does that help your flagging ego or do you need more point scoring...just maybe said:Actually, it would appear I'm not the only one who has read it that way. Which isn't hard, given it's pretty hard to separate the words of a person...from the person who said them.
More tragic that you are trying to pretend you were meaning that.
Very sad and shameful performance on your behalf, NMW.
NMWBloods said:Suuure, you know what I was thinking more than I did because you are so amazingly brilliant. There does that help your flagging ego or do you need more point scoring...
NMWBloods said:Suuure, you know what I was thinking more than I did because you are so amazingly brilliant.
NMWBloods said:"haranguing the father" - haha - like he knows or cares what I am saying, and as if I can't have a different view on people's lives.
I note also that other people in similar situations don't have the same view as him.
And if it was so obvious, why are you the one making such a big fuss and not everyone...
Just tragic that yet again you make up things to start a fight. You seem to like fighting. I guess that's because you lose every argument (NPT, Pearl Harbour, 1991 protests, US a basketbase (twice), etc etc) so you have no choice. You must be used to starting fights by yourself just so you can have a conversation...
just maybe said:This guy's son got beheaded by Zarqawi. Maybe you should show a bit more respect, you arrogant prick.
It's like having an obsessed little nerd stalker following me around from thread to thread, nipping at my ankles and trying to start a fight.just maybe said:Lose every argument? I love how you proclaim yourself the winner when you like. You just hate that I've exposed you as a hypocrite and a shameless pointscorer... I critique the evidence you produce, you don't answer it and then you proclaim yourself the winner...classic.
Starting fights by myself? No, of course not. But then, that's something a sad old bag in a mid-life crisis would think up because he's bereft of any other ideas.
Was my grammar correct, sir?
NMWBloods said:It's like having an obsessed little nerd stalker following me around from thread to thread, nipping at my ankles and trying to start a fight.
I stated quite clearly what I meant by the comment and if you can't understand it when others can and you choose to wilfully misinterpret, then go ahead if somehow it makes you feel better.
As for arguments, you've never critiqued a single thing, you always resort to name calling, and no one ever backs up your point of view. Have you ever wondered about the last point...? Nah, you're probably used to it from real life experiences...
just maybe said:If this is true, yet another example of meathead stupidity by the American army.
Sure, Zarqawi was an evil bastard, but this is a gross breach of the Geneva Conventions, basic human decency and monumentally idiotic given that it has not only martyred him, but lost them a potentially very useful source of information. He was worth far more in life than death.
He uses exactly the same methodology as U NIT.just maybe said:Lose every argument? I love how you proclaim yourself the winner when you like. You just hate that I've exposed you as a hypocrite and a shameless pointscorer... I critique the evidence you produce, you don't answer it and then you proclaim yourself the winner...classic.
Starting fights by myself? No, of course not. But then, that's something a sad old bag in a mid-life crisis would think up because he's bereft of any other ideas.
Was my grammar correct, sir?
just maybe said:Rubbish. Berg said them, of course it's utterly relevant. Not only did you not at all make it clear you were 'only commenting on the words' originally, but they're intrinsically tied up with who he is.
Now you're just backpedalling past because you got busted being an arrogant prick.
Fact remains, until you've walked a mile in his shoes you should shut your mouth and have some bloody respect. The man's son got beheaded, maybe his perspective on Zarqawi's death means a hell of a lot more than your jumped-up proclamations.
Oh really? Let's just consider this post and the one about banned weapons. Perfect examples where you've gone berserk in your self-appointed role as SC&P policeman!just maybe said:Actually, you usually follow me into threads, and you're the one who goes after me most of the time. I can go and find the post where you were talking about 'teaching me'. Quite clearly, you follow me.
'Caught'? What was I 'caught' saying? What do you think I meant?You stated 'quite clearly' after I'd called you on it. Always easy to change it when caught, eh?
Ummm... you've never critiqued anything and I couldn't find one case where anyone agreed with you.Of course I've critiqued you, you just run away whenever I do.
And it seems plenty of people back up my point of view...just look through recent threads and people agree with me.
Ha - yes, that's like "arrogant prcik", "hypocrite", etc etcAs for name calling...how about that last line of yours? Hypocrite, once again.
Have you worked out yet whether you think Cuba is or isn't communist...?Murray said:He uses exactly the same methodology as U NIT.
Has anyone ever seen them in a room together?
NMWBloods said:It's like having an obsessed little nerd stalker following me around from thread to thread, nipping at my ankles and trying to start a fight, who also somehow thinks he's the 'internet police' and needs to 'monitor' me!?!
Actually, you don't even need to respond any more. You caught me fair and square, so that's it.just maybe said:You stated 'quite clearly' after I'd called you on it. Always easy to change it when caught, eh?