I’m not stuck in any way, I agree it has to change, the whole draft is ****ed.
But brushing off being pissed because they can get the player anyway is off, if this happened to us, you and all of us would be peaking.
The AFL have given their babies a leg up, now that they are set, screw the rest.
You’d be happy as a Crows supporter if you had to pay more than Brisbane and Gold Coast have?
The following year they are saying Port may have 2 x top 10 players, 4 first rounders they would need.
You don’t think they’ve got a reason to feel aggrieved after other clubs have benefited? In particularly the reigning premiers and Gold Coast?
If it was us you’d be peaking
Narcissism is questioning posters opinions, right… you just questioned mine, narcissist!
You’ve just rolled out an explanation as to why Nicks doesn’t rate him and said what he said without even knowing it, he had no intention of playing him, doesn’t rate him, stupidly preferred others, you...
lol, Dowling started the year very well. Had 34 touches against South, which I dare say led to the question being asked.
Are you ignoring the high injury count in 2024 which led to opportunities? Are you ignoring he played 1 game as sub in 2025?
Are you ignoring Nicks preferred Murphy last...
Wow, so Geelong are going to rewrite Smiths contract, no more years but pay him substantially more as one of the best mids in the competition.
This gets even funnier.
Look, perhaps you can give an explanation as to why a coach would publicly say in April, a player in his second year would be unlikely to play the whole year. Now a reporter isn’t going to just ask about Dowling if he wasn’t playing well.
Yes he played 9 games, how many as sub and what was our...