Not sure - haven't tested that - I'm sure if you flagged it in advance to get around the system nobody would object ie. I'm going to be dropping X player but to get through waivers I'm going to put it down as Y.
We can swap them back in the background.
Do we really think the season will actually start?
The theory was we'd do the same as last year with waivers each week on Thursday and FA on the Friday (excluding Thursday players who would be locked out).
So unless he's a Richmond or Carlton player you can fill your boots on the Friday.
I...
I agree that I think we need a new approach to making decisions like this. It got 4 likes which I took as a tick for uf but the rest didn’t respond so we end up with half of us assuming 1 March is the go and the others not.
it didn’t help that I stuffed up the date for when week 1 of marsh...
Back to battle debate....potentially need some education....
if we’re set on 3 talls back and forward along with a ruck and each tall plays 85-90% do we not need a 7th tall in battle to replace the 7*10-15%?
Appreciate that we may still have an additional tall to the oppos who may use a tall...
I set it for 1 March for now as none of them were rfas in the system.
I reckon we continue on here until prior to start of first marsh game and then move to the weekly uf waivers approach on a weekly basis. The first week of marsh ends on 1march so might be ok as is.
in any case continue on...
I've selected my keepers - makes it sound easy for you to say yes to them - hope it is as easy as it sounds.
You've got us skipping all the bye weeks - I thought last years, 3-week single round worked well....
If we do the same again we'd need to have one of the weeks down as being player -...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.