How is that a troll? I was thinking about it last night but only posted now. These players are unusual players if they can put it all together they can't be stopped.
Just wondering is North trying to turn Majak Daw into a Naitanui type player? Is he being told to focus on forward pressure and winning contested ball?
I only watched the last 10 minutes but that was disgusting. Petrie/Grundy contest where Grundy first held onto Petrie then Petrie put his arm around the neck. They both infringed should mean play on and Petrie ended up with the mark. Cost North a shot at goal then the ball goes down the other...
lol she is such a flog. How do people like her get paid to talk so much shit? Even when she is proven wrong she still is in denial saying she's right. Unbelievable.
Kangaroos have scored from frees more than WC. How about Lynch's "holding the ball"? Or Selwood being tackled around the head and then Harvey kicked the goal? It has gone both ways, WC have been first to the ball more often due to WC's rapage of the North Melbourne rucks.
I said WC had the better run with umpires over the whole game but Kangaroos clearly infringed WC more times than WC did Kangaroos and the umpires then ****ed up for both times at different times. WC was the better team and deserved to win.
And Kerr's free was technically correct. Your player...
That's 1 of the 3. I'm quite sure there were 3 incidents but I can only remember 1 other atm. When 3 WC players were trailing a Kangaroos guy and he just padelled it 5 metres toward the boundary. WC players let him push it over but still no call. First one was a 100% free you cannot argue.
You complain about the delibrate free on the wing but then how about the THREE delibrates 20 metres from WC's goal that were not paid.
Yes WC had a slightly better run with the umpires but they were bad both ways.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.