Recent content by RA1NFALL

If Murphy can get to 50 games averaging a goal and 10 possies a game, I'm sure rowey will be fine.

I have absolutely zero faith in Tex playing anywhere near the edge or centre. He should be inside 50 all day long. When I read the piece on our site about him moving up the ground and I saw the word 'wing', I genuinely instinctively laughed out loud.

I hope not

Did he play mid in SANFL?

Agreed. It's not all about where on the board the picks are, just ask the suns. Generally we have drafted pretty well recently. Besides Gooch. Probably our biggest 1st round bust in a while.

Stengle is our best shot at a 'Betts-type'. can't see McAdam kicking more than 20 in a year, Murphy is a dud IMO. Stengle is a natural FP that looks for the goal.

Or 3 Greenwoods, Keaths, McGoverns...

I used to like Knight and thought he had potential as a nice pressure forward and tagger. Last 2 years hes been avg, but can't entirely blame him for whats happened. Now new coach, new fresh start, coach loves hard nuts and loves to tag. Could flourish under Nicks.

Jenkins? Fog almost kicked half as many goals as Jenkins in 4 games. Jenkins is the half the reason Fog wasn't playing. Betts 6 of 21 games he was goal-less. 33 when the season starts. Keath I think would have done well staying and a bit dissapointed. He'll be 28 at the start of the season...

I'd play Murphy at crowmania serving again.

A club that needs cleaning out and refreshing, cleaned out. Pass. Would've liked some more steals to our trades, but in all seriousness I cannot see any of our losses doing anything decent for their new team, besides maybe Keath and CEY. Keath could be a solid defender for Bulldogs. CEY...

I know right. Nicks' first press conference and Smitty and Laird in the back listening. Yeah that looks like a couple of South Aussie's who want out.

I think the worst part of this offseason so far is Jenkins still staying. to have a so called "fresh start" but to have this rat in the building is kind of an oxymoron.

So technically for a future 2nd. So technically pick 20-25. And they were arguing over giving up pick #23? I don't get it.

What's left on the table after the Bruce for #32 and #51 deal? Not taking the #45.