Fmd. Went from members, to a few, to a couple.
Read my replies to Chief. Aboriginals are untied when it comes to standing against white man but within their groups there can be thousands of years of rivalry etc.
How do we know that one group won't end up becoming disadvantaged in said system...
That's probably the resounding reason why. Many can't picture it in practice and where it sits in our system.
We're just told it's the solution to the problem and to trust the system that hasn't even existed yet.
I'd get behind it if it actually existed and showed proven results compared to...
No comment because you don't know or that's what was intended of the Voice? Come on educate the unwashed here. I'm genuinely curious where this body sits in the system.
Pretty much. If you want to be fair, fork out the money for every mob in the country or not at all.
Why is it a bad thing to...
Then don't vote governments who won't have a policy of keeping the legislation.
And what if it's not working? Do we keep hitting our head against the wall? That's why I don't understand why constitution proponents are saying we can easily remove it via referendum. Yeah to the tune of half a...
The ****. The the voice is outside of this "top-down" system? Explain it it to me. I'll admit I'm ****ing confused. The pamphlet that I've read all summarised is that representatives are ELECTED, and they carry the communities wishes etc to parliament but they are still UNDER governance are they...
No...how do i put this lightly. You end up with the same ****ing situation we have today...many disadvantaged and unheard groups. Only at the cost of more taxpayer money being spent to pay these public servants.
Yeah I don't.
Regardless, legislation of the Voice needs majority support. And nothing's stopping a majority government from repealing it but that should be seen as a good thing no? If it's doing what it proposed to do, it shouldn't have to worry about being gutted from legislation.
"Members" and "The Voice" is NOT detailed.
Are you that naive to think the different groups will happily go along with electing someone outside of their mob to represent their mob? Or that they'll be singing kumbaya to eternity once the Voice actually happens? Lmao it's obvious you've never...
Then write in legislation that repealing it needs bipartisan support. Or is that too much common sense?
Well lumping both under one question was a mistake then wasn't it. But no, blame the majority of the public for being racists and ignore the ineptitude of the referendum proponents.
So it's not one suit but a multitude of people representing the different groups all across Australia? And you're happy to pay a public servants wages for these multitude of public servants that only serves 3% of the public? Not accounting thier expenses to bring said issues to Canberra?
Last...
Remote indigenous communities in QLD, NT, WA ect don't need another Canberra bureaucrat lining their fat wallets. That money would be better spent helping the younger working age groups with learning trades, getting tickets etc and setting them up for life of independence. Actually helping to...
Holy hell, talk about throwing the toys out of the cot.
😆
we actually have a decent aboriginal community here in town, and even more so in our 52,000 km2 shire council area. Different groups based on the towns you go to in the shire. And being the gate way to the Cape, you experience those...