Reply to thread

No it isnt semantics.

Getting a dose of medicine from a pharmacy and then someone claiming your entire extended family’s four years around that singular treatment, which at a micro level involved the employment of a person who was subcontracted by that pharmacy on a casual basis - by calling them ‘the subcontractor years’ for that whole extended family - you think distinguishing between that, and full-time employment of someone is semantics?

All of which ignores that the substance was legal.

We can add that to the legal ground dimensions as one of the other legal but illegal things we do.