P.S I expect Lake to get 4 weeks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
INB4 Lake gets a lenient 2 week suspension and Hawk fans whinge about an AFL conspiracy to stop him playing Sydney.Should be 4+. A very bad look.
P.S I expect Lake to get 4 weeks.
He'll get 4. 3 weeks suspension, and Clarko will make him play a VFL game before he gets recalled to the seniors.I expect that your expectations wont be met.
No-one ever eye-gouged those blokes..............if only before the king-hit or 'educated elbow' ruled out the possibility..
If we're playing that game, I'd have loved to see how that big inbred, Petrie, would go eye-gouging against the likes of Mattthews/Dermie/Dipper/Ayres and co.
Still crying salty tears from last Friday?????yep, I'm sure he's just petrified.
If we're playing that game, I'd have loved to see how that big inbred, Petrie, would go eye-gouging against the likes of Mattthews/Dermie/Dipper/Ayres and co.
Yes, clearly Petrie was in no discomfort there, and had no right to try to stop Clarke from choking him.It is fair to say he was lucky the first time.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-06-24/mrp-full-statement-round-13
Contact between North Melbourne’s Drew Petrie and Fremantle’s Zac Clarke from the fourth quarter of Sunday’s match was assessed. The panel said Clarke had his elbow across Petrie’s neck region as the two players were grappling, holding him down on the ground. Petrie was not looking at his Fremantle opponent as he tried to push him off him, and he made contact with Clarke’s facial area. After viewing all available footage and receiving a medical report from the Fremantle Football Club, it was the view of the panel that Petrie’s contact to the face of his opponent was minimal and the action by Petrie was primarily to push his opponent off him. No further action was taken
Still crying salty tears from last Friday?????
Yes, clearly Petrie was in no discomfort there, and had no right to try to stop Clarke from choking him.
Quite likely.Not really. We lost a game, it happens.
One thing I'd guarantee, I woke up this morning a lot happier about where my football club is at than you did.
We've seen two incidents where opponents tried to take out North's no. 1 forward by wrestling with him, and applying a chokehold.Yes, Petrie was well within his rights to eye-gouge his opponent. Again.
Poor Drew must be the most picked-on, unluckiest guy going around.
But I go to bed, and wake up, a lot happier about my life than you could.
He also got a phone call from Jeff Gieschen, congratulating him for showing such self-control.Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...all-headlock-20100523-w3y3.html#ixzz36mr13yt2
This would be the most similar incident in years...
Big Bad Bazza just copped a fine
Of course Brian will get 2 weeks as we play the Swans in... 2 weeks I guess
He also got a phone call from Jeff Gieschen, congratulating him for showing such self-control.
Yes, clearly Petrie was in no discomfort there, and had no right to try to stop Clarke from choking him.
I was tempted to slam Brian Lake until I saw this picture in this thread:
http://cdndata.bigfooty.com/2014/07/65481_09ab7cb96a9a314ae3d4fee3f3a49fca.jpeg
Brian Lake and Drew Petrie are two of my favourite players, but the way they both acted was pretty deplorable (no excuses for choking or eye gouging). Wrestling is part of the game. Drew needs to work on not reflexively going for a person's face. Brian needs to work on his temper.
Simples.
Not going to argue the point. Don't want to remember anything about that game!Fair shake of the sauce bottle that incident was entirely instigated/provoked by Petrie, not Clarke.
Also, the AFL have confirmed that the “unnecessary and unreasonable contact’’ to Lake’s face happened before the strangling. I don't think it's fair to say that Drew Petrie is entirely blameless of these circumstances considering this fact.Umm if he was gouging he would use more than a pinky finger
How can the AFL base the decision on medical reports when there is no way to tell what was pre and post strangling?Also, the AFL have confirmed that the “unnecessary and unreasonable contact’’ to Lake’s face happened before the strangling. I don't think it's fair to say that Drew Petrie is entirely blameless of these circumstances considering this fact.
reference: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/a...-thats-no-excuse/story-fni5f0at-1226980883740
it's sad that this incident has taken the attention away from what was a great win for NMNot going to argue the point. Don't want to remember anything about that game!
i think the players code goes out the window when you're at the tribunal trying to save your own skin, this could be a ruse by the afl to compel Petrie to tell the whole story rather than cover for Lake, and thus enable them to make an example of Lake, which they should as that conduct should be stamped out of the game.If it there is any truth to the fact Petrie nearly/ somewhat did 'pass out' - Would it not be fair to overturn his reprimand? That would almost be an act of self defense.
The problem being (if he did almost pass out) he will deny it happened "players code" - So either he unnecessarily gauged Lake or did it in desperation.
The AFL need to make an example of Lake I feel. Players will lose their tempers in the heat of battle quite often - but they have to know the no go zones regardless of circumstances.
It's probably this point of view (this was before the strangling for clarification):How can the AFL base the decision on medical reports when there is no way to tell what was pre and post strangling?
Secondly the side on angle provides a bad angle to view it as it is hard to judge depth the other angle show Petrie trying to get his arm between himself and Lake
View attachment 66578