Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No way. Judd has been far the superior player. Unfortunately on this site people get carried away with what happened last week instead of the last 10 years.if you compared Judd, Hodge and Ball after 3 years it would have been
1. Judd
2. Ball
3. Hodge
if you compare it now you would say
1. Hodge
2. Judd
3. Ball
I love how every year we have it all figured out...............................during the offseason. The parade of bullshit articles in the offseason is off to a flyer this year.Read more: Blueprint Part 2
I love how every year we have it all figured out...............................during the offseason. The parade of bullshit articles in the offseason is off to a flyer this year.
If you were at a club with the drug culture they had you would have left too. The man has integrity of the highest order.I would have Hogde any day over Judas if you factor not just playing career but as a loyal club man who would almost die for his club. Jack Dyer would approve.
My definition of shithouse is nothing went right. FJ has got a lot right, also a lot wrong particularly later in the draft but to me that doesn't deserve that rating.I really, really hope you're right, TJ, but please forgive my cynicism when I read the sort of crap that Blair Hartley was reported as saying in the Herald Sun. FJ's efforts, and that of Hartley himself, have been shithouse, a fact that didn't escape most Big Footy subscribers who went through this in great detail last year and published wholesale criticism of our football dept efforts.
I'm not suggesting that Hartley should say that in public, but better to say NOTHING than to continue on with the garbage that we, as supporters, were subjected to last year.
I will be convinced when they DO things, not when they SAY things. But as I said, I'm with you in wanting them to get it right.
Big difference between adequate and shithouse imo. I agree with the adequate rating mind you.In the spirit of the debate, I agree we have nailed some great first round picks. Deledio, Cotchin, Reiwoldt, and Ellis are as good as any and you would be delighted with them. But getting first rounders correct would be a minimum KPI I would have thought for recruiting officers. You would be a very easy marker if you said Conca was a success as pick 6. Vlastuin and Lennon show promise but I don't think we can fairly judge them yet.
My point is that Hartley said Jackson has done an "amazing" job. If he said that he has done an "adequate job", I wouldn't argue the point one way or the other, but they are his words, not mine.
If Jackson's efforts are "amazing" then I am totally incorrect about my definition of the word. I guess everyone sees it differently.
And I do apologise about putting words in your mouth, I simply made an assumption. I think our recruiting and development activities are ordinary and said so many times last year. The fact that some other clubs might languish around at our level is not relevant for mine.
We may well be much better this year in these areas, but words won't do it as far as I'm concerned, actions will.
No way. Judd has been far the superior player. Unfortunately on this site people get carried away with what happened last week instead of the last 10 years.
Its hard to pick as Judd clearly had a better first half of his career, Hodge clearly had a better 2nd halfI would have Hodge any day over Judas if you factor not just playing career but as a loyal club man who would almost die for his club. Jack Dyer would approve.
It wouldnt surprise me if we pick up Judd in 2 years time on a basic 2 year contract.Its hard to pick as Judd clearly had a better first half of his career, Hodge clearly had a better 2nd half
Judd has won 2 Brownlows and a Premiership
Hodge has won 3 Premierships
If I could take Judd at his peak then I'd want him at Richmond over Hodge, but over an entire career... Hodge, just
Imo you can't use flags as a guide as a player may be a gun but his team is junk. Then again you shouldn't use brownlows either as its very subjective. Very hard to pick a winner with these 2 players as they both are guns but for me player v player Judd is better.Its hard to pick as Judd clearly had a better first half of his career, Hodge clearly had a better 2nd half
Judd has won 2 Brownlows and a Premiership
Hodge has won 3 Premierships
If I could take Judd at his peak then I'd want him at Richmond over Hodge, but over an entire career... Hodge, just
Except they both played in strong teams so I think its a fair criteriaImo you can't use flags as a guide as a player may be a gun but his team is junk. Then again you shouldn't use brownlows either as its very subjective. Very hard to pick a winner with these 2 players as they both are guns but for me player v player Judd is better.
Maybe but it is very hard to win them. If the hawks had Judd instead of and vice versa would the flags flip and or would the results be different? I would think the hawks would've won more. But this is subjective I know.Except they both played in strong teams so I think its a fair criteria
Yep fair point, it all goes into the mix.i guess you cant count B&F's then as it was easier to win one at Carlton than the Hawks.
its actually a good comparison its very hard to choose
No way. Judd has been far the superior player. Unfortunately on this site people get carried away with what happened last week instead of the last 10 years.
Gale. Peggy. Dimma. All said we won't gloss over the 9 in a row and do something.
Trade period yielded us four fifths of **** all.
This is the draft they need to nail every pick. This is the pre season they need to develop like they say they can. This is the season that no excuses happen for where we finish in the season.
This is it. The last straw.