Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He just had to build a tank
While Rachele only 2 CBAs, he played as mid/forward at around the ground stoppages.Centre bounce appearances
View attachment 1958566
Post of the week.Can't believe how quick people were to jump off of Nicks. Watch them all come crawling back now
Also... does anyone know if you can un-melt a membership card?
Oh i misinterpreted it. I thought it was turkey. I gotta study my birds moreHe was saying nicks is a goose.
Could have been a galahOh i misinterpreted it. I thought it was turkey. I gotta study my birds more
Where you been for the first month?
Agree!Fog had a lot of 25% chance opportunities. Still, I want him to be better and... win those.
It's unfair, I know, but I want the bloke to do crazy good s**t all the time. He almosts it, almost all the time.
And, he turned a random "shoulda been OOB" into a contested posession, and a low flat missile to Cook... It turned the game. Right at the "well, it's time to give up" mark on the clock.
Yeah, master coaching to dragged kicking and screaming to eventually change the midfield mix.Great win. Accounting for the context it's probably the best in years. Huge positive that Murray and Thilthorpe are still to come back, both of whom would significantly improve the team as direct swaps.
Lots of good players but I think Worrell had his best game for the club. Has been quite poor at times this year and was really excellent and a huge reason why our backline stood up well. Jones' second half was easily the best he has played in 2024 as well. Hopefully he's turning a corner as he was pretty good at times last year. Obviously Rankine, Rachele, Walker, Keays, Soligo all terrific. Liked Crouch's game too.
McHenry had a dreadful game, and Fogarty, Smith and Cook aside from the late goal were pretty poor too. I think everyone survives except McHenry though, they all did enough or warrant a bit more patience.
A lot of chat here about a radical midfield change but it really wasn't that different, it's been more of a week to week progression since the Fremantle game. Main thing was increasing Rankine from a part-time mid to full-time which was obviously very successful and he was probably best on. Missed 3 pretty gettable shots at goal too so could have been even better.
But in terms of CBAs it was a fairly even split between Rankine, Soligo, Crouch, Dawson and Laird, with the main change from last week being more Rankine with Dawson spending more time in other roles like Crouch/Laird have been, with Rankine and Soligo the two permanent mids. Obviously worked well but I think the future probably still doesn't include Laird as much, even though he was pretty good tonight. Especially if Berry comes in, there's just too many players filling that role.
Main point here is it's been a gradual progression in this direction for a couple of weeks. I don't think the coaching staff decided to make a radical change this week, I think they have been working towards a new setup and you can see it happening each week with the changes. Hopefully what we saw tonight was the team settling in to the new setup and we keep making some gradual tweaks.
To be fair, I'm 99% certain that it wasn't touched.
To be fair the last 5 years have probably made a lot of supporters fair weather. Who really cares?Nah, the fair weathers who disappeared, will magically re-appear and declare they never lost faith.
We should’ve stuck fat like them, and hidden away until we won a game
A metaphor for Nicks gameplan?Where you been for the first month?
Thanks NicksyI did that once. It was hollow inside.
I hope you are enjoying your Saturday night after a great Crows win.Berry playing poorly is a trend. Berry playing well is a single data point.
I didn't say it does?
Yes, lets shut down discussion about players until their careers are over, only then can we form an opinion on whether they were good or not. We must wait to look at the totality of the available data, instead of looking at the totality of the available data.
I thought the directive from the AFL a few years back was for players to turn in that situation and not go in head first. Just as Crouch did. Did he even get him high?? It was shoulder at worst. I don't think it warranted a free kick.So Crouch. He turned into the player and took possession of the ball in the same motion. I’m not sure anymore what that’s worth. A fine? A week? We have to have his brother back?
The blues player was dazed so I’m guessing he hit the head .I thought the directive from the AFL a few years back was for players to turn in that situation and not go in head first. Just as Crouch did. Did he even get him high?? It was shoulder at worst. I don't think it warranted a free kick.
Really liked him coming off half back at times today, with smaller stints in the middle. It is great to Soligo becoming our primary midfielder atm!Laird was poor when he was in the middle! When he was at half back he felt natural and was effective
Ugly: The love in for Weitering by the commentators. Imagine the hype when his direct opponent doesn't kick a bag on him.
Not only does he not blaze away, he also doesn't panic and instead draws a second defender (before nailing a gorgeous look away handball) to give Berry the time and space to take the shot.Put some respect on Keays for not blazing away there. You know he wanted to.
He acted like he had received head high contact. To me it looked like he was putting a heap of mayo on it.The blues player was dazed so I’m guessing he hit the head .
It looked fairly innocent, but it will come down to whether it was deemed reckless or avoidable. Thankfully it was a contested piece play and I can’t see how it could be deemed reckless. It was accidental collision, but we will see.I thought the directive from the AFL a few years back was for players to turn in that situation and not go in head first. Just as Crouch did. Did he even get him high?? It was shoulder at worst. I don't think it warranted a free kick.