- Banned
- #151
Sounds like a conspiracy theory.They probably wanted her to cry to get viewers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sounds like a conspiracy theory.They probably wanted her to cry to get viewers
You want to talk about 'rubbish'?
Let's talk about a guy who had been in the news countless times for 'extremism' somehow not being on a terrorist watchlist.
I mean how absurd does this s**t have to get before you start to question?
And they will. Problem -> reaction -> solution.Incompetence doesn't equal conspiracy.
And I would have thought the CTs would be pleasantly surprised that he wasn't on a watch list. After all, isn't that what these "false flags" are carried out for? To increase spying etc...
Don't underestimate the 'live' element of the story that the media takes and runs with. That kind of thing is absolute gold to them. They'd have been all over the Cairns one if it turned into a siege with all those children.smells fishy to me.
more so when contrasted with media coverage of the 8 children killed in cains
the comparison of the media coverage is fascinating
Don't underestimate the 'live' element of the story that the media takes and runs with. That kind of thing is absolute gold to them. They'd have been all over the Cairns one if it turned into a siege with all those children.
It's much easier to have around the clock media coverage of something that is unfolding before our eyes compared to something that has already taken place. Of course they're going to use that to boost their ratings rather than showing reruns of M.A.S.H. Clearly the guy should have been behind bars already, this happens all too often unfortunately. Adrian Bayley is an excellent exhibit for this. That murder case also got a crazy amount of media attention as it pulls the heart strings of so many people due to the 'that could have been me' aspect of it. The media know this and saturate us with it, journalism 101.- the 24/7 news coverage on every tv channel vs more or less nothing
- the timing given the passing of the 'terror' laws removing rights and some debate about removal of rights of citizens of
Australia
- i know people contracted to Asio and you cannot piss without multiple security personal watching you. I doubt they did not know of this guy... given the power, money and ability they have .. "oh but i guess we have to justify the new powers they get"
- Australian and Canadian leadership giving identical speeches ...
- practicing terror training in the same place a year earlier...
- the guy killed / burned his wife or something, and yet was not in the clink. if i did that i wouldn't be at work or home id be in jail ...
even if you don't think Boston or 9/11 was suss... there is proven historical president for the government taking the piss to benefit themselfs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
It's much easier to have around the clock media coverage of something that is unfolding before our eyes compared to something that has already taken place. Of course they're going to use that to boost their ratings rather than showing reruns of M.A.S.H. Clearly the guy should have been behind bars already, this happens all too often unfortunately. Adrian Bayley is an excellent exhibit for this. That murder case also got a crazy amount of media attention as it pulls the heart strings of so many people due to the 'that could have been me' aspect of it. The media know this and saturate us with it, journalism 101.
Why do you coincidence theorists instantly resort to laughable exaggerations when challenged?
Don't underestimate the 'live' element of the story that the media takes and runs with. That kind of thing is absolute gold to them. They'd have been all over the Cairns one if it turned into a siege with all those children.
Loan gunman holding 40 hostages!
Doesn't say allot for coffe drinkers!
Why do you post laughably bad YouTube videos? The videos you post are as biased, and unbelievable as the MSM you're against.
But then that would become a hoax too.
I refuse to take anything you post seriously until you understand the difference between a lone gunman and a loan gunman.
There's fishy elements to this story, as there always is with what media reports to us.
Why was he still on the streets, with that rap sheet that he had? 40 or so alleged sexual assaults and accessory to murder to me you don't get bail for, but that's just opinion.
Why do you coincidence theorists instantly resort to laughable exaggerations when challenged?
Ask yourself, if this woman was so well-known to channel 7, why did the producer (or whoever handed Natalie the info) give her the info live on air?
How does that make sense to any sane person?
You think the producer (or whoever) put an unsuspecting Natalie Barr through the ordeal of learning her friend/associate had died, live on air, just for the ratings?The want the reaction, it's supposedly good tv.
I find it extremely strange that the alleged "terrorist" was shown holding up, perfectly reasonable signs that stated things like: "Stop the war in Afghanistan!, Bring back the troops!" etc. if this was a conspiracy, this could of been used to demonize protesters trying to prevent war occurring in the middle east (Government(s) such as AU and US benefit financially from Wars in the middle east). Additionally, Tony has straight away jumped the gun on new "security" legislation etc. seems fishy. lots of discrepancies within the reporting itself. when a presenter started "crying" she stated that a somewhat relative of hers was confirmed shot dead (or something along those lines) however, she had died from a heart attack. etc. Not to mention the suspicious "drill" that occurred in the same place a year ago.
A good way to look at situations like this is; Who benefits? obviously not the Australian Citizens, ISIS has it's own primary agendas to achieve, and can't really afford to start 'terrorizing' people on the other side of the world, the Australian Government is one of the only candidates who benefits from this situation. How? by imposing new 'security' measures (Think NSA, NDAA etc.) on the Australian pop. to keep them under tabs.
but that's just my opinion.
feel free to highlight any discrepancies in my observations and inferences if you wish, I am open to changing my mind, should the evidence point that way.
You think the producer (or whoever) put an unsuspecting Natalie Barr through the ordeal of learning her friend/associate had died, live on air, just for the ratings?
She literally said, 'We're just finding out...'Possibly. She may have also known well in advance about it but said she was still good to go. Once she was actually live on air and had to talk about it, she couldn't handle it.
You haven't opened them yet.Nothing sinister in my eyes.
Hoddle St, Queen St, Port Arthur, Martin Place all received massive coverage because the media where about while events were unfolding.smells fishy to me.
more so when contrasted with media coverage of the 8 children killed in cains
the comparison of the media coverage is fascinating
She literally said, 'We're just finding out...'
Come on man, even your own feeble attempt at explaining this away involves accepting Barr is a liar.
You haven't opened them yet.
yeah, this is the most implausible thing posted in this thread that someone in power might doYou think the producer (or whoever) put an unsuspecting Natalie Barr through the ordeal of learning her friend/associate had died, live on air, just for the ratings?
Are you going to attempt to address the issue?