Retired #26: Cale Hooker - Has announced his retirement at season's end šŸ·

Remove this Banner Ad

sfdsf.jpg
Contract Status: Retiring at the end of Season 2021
Last Game Played: Round 19, 2021 (omit)
Injury Status: n/a
 
Last edited:
reincarnated said:
I thought he should have been named in the All Aus team. Not his fault he had to move for sake of the team. He was leading the intercept marks or around that mark before he moved forward. He had a better year than Gibson anyway.

Now we have three All Aus in the team that we have drafted and developed, apart from Jobe. Sigh. We should be in the top 4 and playing in the Prelim Final. Bloody Dank and Weapon, and AFL, ASADA and WADA. Completely stuffed up our progression.

It will be nice if Zacka or Zerrett can step up and become an all aus. Even Daniher has a potential to take that huge stride.
Click to expand...


We're not to blame at all, are we? Nothing to do with us!
 
Schmick said:
Re: Cale Hooker


Very fast. 2.88 in the 20m sprint and a 7.94 in agility, with good endurance all at 195cm. Seems like an athlete, but can he play footy?
Click to expand...



The scary thing about Hooker is that his physical capabilities have been dramatically limited by injury.

Check out the post quoted above setting out his sprint test results.

Add the mobility he had as a junior and he is not just the best defender in the game by a long way. He'd be encroaching on all time territory.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

So it sounds like it's back to defence for Hooker according to Worsfold on trade radio.

It's probably for the best. He is clearly a better defender than forward. Worried about who partners Joe though.
 
Marley10 said:
McKernan?
Click to expand...

Maybe. I personally think he's not good enough though. I'd be hoping we can get a ruck and have Bellchambers forward 75-80%. Then recruit a VFL key forward and use him and McKernan as back-up. That's assuming no AFL level key forwards want to switch clubs.
 
loopy_cam said:
Maybe. I personally think he's not good enough though. I'd be hoping we can get a ruck and have Bellchambers forward 75-80%. Then recruit a VFL key forward and use him and McKernan as back-up. That's assuming no AFL level key forwards want to switch clubs.
Click to expand...
Liam McBean is a good option. Doubt Richmond would let him go that easily
 
loopy_cam said:
Maybe. I personally think he's not good enough though. I'd be hoping we can get a ruck and have Bellchambers forward 75-80%. Then recruit a VFL key forward and use him and McKernan as back-up. That's assuming no AFL level key forwards want to switch clubs.
Click to expand...

What an awful forward line - Unless JD jumps out of the ground this is a VFL forward line.
 
Marley10 said:
Liam McBean is a good option. Doubt Richmond would let him go that easily
Click to expand...

There is a reason why players like Mcbean or Grimley have played little or No AFL footy in 3+ years. But let's bring them to Essendon.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Hooker back is the right move.

Our forward line looked good with him up there but our defense went to absolute s**t.

McKernan with Langford and Edwards as other marking targets will look good next to Daniher.

Hopefully we just move the ball faster next year as well. Half our problems last year came from the fact we looked to go sideways before going forward nearly every time.
 
loopy_cam said:
How many forward lines have two stars in the key posts? It's usually one good tall and another just providing a target.
Click to expand...
Sydney, Hawthorn, Adelaide (yes, I count JJ) spring to mind.
 
eth-dog said:
Sydney, Hawthorn, Adelaide (yes, I count JJ) spring to mind.
Click to expand...

That's still not that many. If you look at the grand final teams of the past few years there's quite a few with questionable key forwards. Sam Reid, Chris Dawes, Kositchke etc. It's great if you can have two stars but it's not essential. If Daniher steps up and we either get Belly there 80% of the time or get any other tall who can consistently take a mark, we'll be ok. I'd hardly say it's a VFL standard key forward line.

Not the thread for this anyway. Hooker is an elite key back of the competition. Let's be happy that we'll have him pairing with Hurley back there.
 
loopy_cam said:
How many forward lines have two stars in the key posts? It's usually one good tall and another just providing a target.
Click to expand...

JD is still developing and not yet at a good level - So we just have targets - We may as well trade in Chris Dawes.

Somehow it has passed over people's heads that the two best attacking teams won the premiership - But go ahead and weaken the forward line.
 
I'm pretty ambivalent whether he plays forward or back. He's great wherever he plays. He is not the problem. In fact i reckon he'd do a better job in the midfield than most of our midfielders right now as well. We just need to find more good players. Hooker will be fine regardless. Overall i'd probably prefer him back because you can probably get away with playing smaller players up forward whereas you need big defenders against some teams no matter what and right now are KP stocks are paper thin - albeit talented.
 
I think I'm pretty happy with him returning to the backline.

However, Woosha will hopefully still use him as a forward weapon on occasion.
 
Doss said:
I think I'm pretty happy with him returning to the backline.

However, Woosha will hopefully still use him as a forward weapon on occasion.
Click to expand...

Use him the same way he used Hunter in their Grand Final years probably. Mainly defence but swing him forward for an immediate impact to reshuffle their defence then put him down back.
 
yaco55 said:
JD is still developing and not yet at a good level - So we just have targets - We may as well trade in Chris Dawes.

Somehow it has passed over people's heads that the two best attacking teams won the premiership - But go ahead and weaken the forward line.
Click to expand...

They also had good tall defenders , with Carlsle gone we need Hooker in defense and have to find another forward option. You are using the Hawks example
well Lake, Gibson and Frawley says you need the good defenders as well.
 
Think that versatility of talls is one of the most overrated and misunderstood concepts in football.

Throwing a guy back or forward to influence a game has its place but all players need to be settled in position. Versatility in general is a concept that borders on being complete bullshit. All the best teams have 4 to 6 forwards who score most of their goals with there being another 4 to 6 players who are rotated through positions in the midfield and on flanks which are more of less the same positions.

I'm happy to have Hooker in defence with Hurley where we can at least ensure we will be seriously strong. Thrown in Hartley and give us a defensive founding that will enable us to take the game on further up field. We need players who can win one on one rather than only be effective when the delivery to a forward is poor.

Bellchambers is going to spend a lot of time deep as a forward in 2015 by the sounds of it. He's the player that will draw the attention from Daniher. Bellchamber, Hooker and Daniher in the one forward line is too cumbersome.

The best use of the currently available talent is for the forward line to then contain the 3 to 4 190cm+ mid sized players we have and some smalls. I still look at McKernan as a genuinely viable forward with his mobility, work rate and hands.
 
yaco55 said:
JD is still developing and not yet at a good level - So we just have targets - We may as well trade in Chris Dawes.

Somehow it has passed over people's heads that the two best attacking teams won the premiership - But go ahead and weaken the forward line.
Click to expand...

I agree we need a lot more from JD. An improved JD and a Chris Dawes type would be a decent tall forward set-up though. We do have a lot of eggs in the Daniher basket.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top