Search results for query: *

Unfortunately in this case I think it's the AFL, not Carlton.

The issue is that teams with dark jumpers are being forced to wear white shorts against a team with a mainly white jumper and dark shorts. North refusing to compromise is causing the issue. No one is saying you can't wear your home jumper, but there is nothing wrong with wearing white shorts at...

Tell that to North.

🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

Lol, they can't even get North to wear white shorts in home games so unlikely.

Getting real sick of North having dummy spits over their shorts.

Then there's St Kilda

I was. Because he didn't bring up Port.

GET OUT

Tell that to North.

Sydney might have something to say unfortunately lol

Probably the first time I've seen Essendon wear their clash against the Crows. Sorry their "heritage" jumper.

Show me on the teddy where the white panel touched you

Richmond in their clash vs WCE would be an epic match-up but it won't happen.

God you guys are slack. Well, you know how it goes.

🙄🙄🙄🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

AFL must still own the rights and trademark to the logo - it as probably a five minute phonecall lol

I wasn't sold on them but they look very schmick. Don't think they should go back to navy, though. Would rather they switch to the Peril full time.

Haven't seen a thread yet. You know the drill.

Still no Federals? At what point does the League and the clubs go "it's not worth it anymore" and re-examine the UM Eagles proposal.

Said it before andiI'll say it again, should be their home kit.

If I time my next trip to Melbourne correctly I'll be in the PBs at the G soon lol

See above. North have obviously kicked up a stink. I mean, look. Home games yada yada, I get that. But there surely comes a time where they sit back and think "does it really matter? It's still our home game."

North have obviously made a huge complaint and the AFL caved. Geelong still wear white shorts in home games, why can't North? Either apply the rule to both of them or not at all.

Jesus Christ, why am I not surprised 🤦‍♂️

This

*Power was a rebrand of an existing club

I think the irony is that Port's Premiership count is often counted as "1" because the SANFL flags don't count (allegedly). Using that logic, Collingwood only has 3 AFL flags as any VFL and VGA flags don't count. My interpretation.

Call me ignorant but I'm curious about the slur, because I'm definitely missing the reference. It's also more than people liked to say (and still do) "you're not Port Adelaide, you're Port Power."

North Melbourne home shorts rule this weekend?