Search results for query: *

Why is Powell's suspension longer than Finlaysons?

And now you're sad about the world?

Slippery Pete is giving us a name. Problem is his current ideas are all too complimentary. I need something with a bit more Gravitas.

You guys can be in my club.

Cool cool. Who else is in this club with me?

Well, it makes sense to. "If you keep playing good, we'll talk about another year". Nothing wrong with that. It's the gaming of the system though. If Smith puts forward "I played all but one game, so we're all sweet, right?" and that's accepted, then we're talking garbage.

I just wanna know what band I'm part of

Aw great, now we're gonna cop another fine

Dunno... we were really efficient (didn't miss) and Port missed a lot (suck it port). On balance, I reckon if both teams kick to normal standards, we lose that game. We did do a good job of making Ports I50 entries wide and shallow, that's true. Still, Boak hit the post, Dixon missed a sitter...

Unless the world goes Topsy Turvy, there is no way TT isn't an upgrade on whichever of Gollant, Himmelberg and Burgess is in the team at that point.

Kinda, that's around the middle of the window, so should be a players absolute peak years. But an elite player for a long time... you've got to think age 24 through 29 is your tip top, should be at your bestest, you won't be this fit, this young, multiple preseasons under your belt again.

Think he got a bad leg knock in a tackle, but he was Ok.

Lolwut We could probably also get rid of say, science and history too. Then we'll see some progress in this country.

By that you mean... us?

One Monkey wont, you need like, infinite monkeys

It's unfair for anyone playing on Charlie though. He's just... so bloody fast and agile.

He's 24 years old right now yeah? So he has entered his prime now. Next 5 years are where it's at for him.

You would need to put a bell inside the ball or something though, so I don't think we're going to offer her a contract. AFL wouldn't allow it.

I don't get it either. Reward Dowling, or Taylor.

Nick Gill

Good: The Sog! Jet The Fog! We look so good when he's playing well! Woz and Max, great stuff. Meh: Want more from my boy Cooky. Ok I guess in a role playing where the ball isn't. Sholl was pretty reasonable actually. No awful moments. What was the point of Smith as sub? Ugly: Agree...

Well, there's Izak's other goal...

Why? Why do we need things legally declared as fruits or vegetables?

Michalanney #2? Sure. Like it. Welsh and Petty, all good additions. Nice. NONE OF THESE GUYS ARE MIDS! Sort yer s**t, AFC.

But it's the one that he wears strapping on?

Was the kid already born by then, or did it retroactively apply?

Does he have to get the haircut?

It just shows he's trying hard, that's all

You have got to be kidding me. Honestly, * this noise. Rash. Mate.

Laird is a solid top 10% in the league player, and the criticism is tough, because he's just about our best player, and we want him to be Bont or Petracca... And he's just not that guy.